?
servfail or a missing ad-bit?
Daniel
On 18.03.22 15:25, lejeczek via bind-users wrote:
Hi guys
how to troubleshoot that?
...
18-Mar-2022 14:17:41.725 warning: EVP_VerifyFinal failed
(verify failure)
18-Mar-2022 14:17:41.725 info: error:0398:digital
envelope routines::invalid digest:crypto/evp
Hi guys
how to troubleshoot that?
...
18-Mar-2022 14:17:41.725 warning: EVP_VerifyFinal failed
(verify failure)
18-Mar-2022 14:17:41.725 info: error:0398:digital
envelope routines::invalid digest:crypto/evp/pmeth_lib.c:959:
18-Mar-2022 14:17:41.725 info: validating paypal.com/DNSKEY:
no va
On 13/11/2021 07:16, Erich Eckner wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 12.11.21 um 18:55 schrieb lejeczek via bind-users:
>> On 12/11/2021 17:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> wouldn't it be easier to setup two different
subdomains in which case you don&#
On 12/11/2021 17:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.11.21 um 17:48 schrieb lejeczek via bind-users:
Hi guys.
I'm looking to setup my subdomin in-house and I'm hoping
for some wise advises from experts, it's my first foray
into this thus go easy on me please.
zone.top -
Hi guys.
I'm looking to setup my subdomin in-house and I'm hoping for
some wise advises from experts, it's my first foray into
this thus go easy on me please.
zone.top - is hosted by a public registrar
priv.zone.top - I want to delegate to my own bind
I'd hope for some generic recipe and poin
Hi guys.
To experts that most likely be silly easy but my brain got
tangled up and cannot get around it now(also being a novice)
Have a zone on a server, say:
- the.zone
with "flat" files being the backend for it. Now wanting to have:
- sub.the.zone
served by the same BIND server, but stor
hi guys
I'm quite sure I must be missing something trivial, yet my logic here
might be failing too...
I have a boxA which for local clients resolves mydom.local just fine.
And I've a boxB which
zone "mydom.local." IN {
forward first;
type forward;
forwarders port 53 { 10.3.1.10
On 22/09/18 21:58, Mark Andrews wrote:
The update policy rules you have don’t allow the apex to be updated. Change
the rule types to “subdomain” and the name fields to “dom.local”.
fantastycznie!
many! thanks
may I also ask why cname does not work in my setup?
client @0x7f4d84094190 10.3.1
On 22/09/18 17:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.09.18 um 17:53 schrieb lejeczek via bind-users:
is it possible to update domain(not hosts of/in the domain) records?
there is nothing like "not hosts of/in the domain"
Something like
domain.local A 10.1.1.100
which is simply an A
hi guys
is it possible to update domain(not hosts of/in the domain) records?
Something like
domain.local A 10.1.1.100
simple, right?
I'm trying nsupdate but it refuses to do above.
many thanks, L.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/lis
hi everyone
I have a quick questionon possibly trivial issue.
I do:
> update delete ddd.dom.local. 86400 in a 10.3.1.100
> send
and that works, but when I try:
> update add dom.local. 86400 in a 10.3.1.100
> send
update failed: REFUSED
..and in logs:
client @0x7fd7a40f2e40 127.0.0.1#9489/key nsu
hi users,
I'm getting lot of below in log:
validating @0x7f53140149a0:
ccnr-winsrv1.xxx.private.other.dom.my.dom A: bad cache hit
(uk.my.dom/DS)
validating @0x7f5314015630:
ccnr-winsrv1.xxx.private.other.dom.my.dom : bad cache
hit (uk.my.dom/DS)
error (broken trust chain) resolving
'ccn
hi fellow users,
I'm having a puzzle to solve and because I'm an amateur I'm
hoping an expert could help, otherwise it'll take me ages.
I have a 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 which runs a
signed zone and another server that forwards to it.
The server(swir.private.aaa.bbb.private.cz
hi everybody
Is it possible with ISC to forward multiple zones to one(or
a few) forwarders without declaring each zone separately?
Something like with "view" or "policy" ?
many thanks.
L.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-u
hi everybody
I'm trying something simple, or I thought it'd be simple, I
realize my question should rather go towards DHCPD
community, but I feel like I might be missing something on
DNS part.
for organizational, or for test if you like, purposes I
would like to have
subdomain.inparent.zone
On 15/10/15 16:01, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 15 October 2015 15:56:42 BST, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
I'm trying a bind setup which could be talked to by dhcpd.
I've bind setup with virtual zones and now trying to set up
dhcpd so it would be updating DNS, but... but.
In
hi everybody
I'm trying a bind setup which could be talked to by dhcpd.
I've bind setup with virtual zones and now trying to set up
dhcpd so it would be updating DNS, but... but.
In dhcpd.conf I'm trying:
subnet 192.168.4.64 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
ddns-domainname "host.domain.my";
ddns
hi everybody
I'd like to ask about possible ways to protect a record - is
it feasible at all?
Or maybe some sort of priority mechanisms?
What I'd like to do is basically to not let DHCP dynamically
update a record that I set earlier manually. My case is
where system has multiple interfaces an
sort of a false alarm
nsupdate with FQDN(dot) did work!(???)
On 17/05/12 12:03, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
when I do:
> server 127.0.0.1
> zone ccnr.biotechnology.
> update add second 86400 in cname first
> send
update failed: NOTZONE
in log I get:
May 17 11:59:10 whal
hi everybody
when I do:
> server 127.0.0.1
> zone ccnr.biotechnology.
> update add second 86400 in cname first
> send
update failed: NOTZONE
in log I get:
May 17 11:59:10 whale named[2910]: debug level is now 5
May 17 12:00:28 whale named[2910]: client 127.0.0.1#33465:
view biotech: signer "
20 matches
Mail list logo
