Re: Request to use "Canonical/Mirror"

2022-05-13 Thread btb via bind-users
On May 13, 2022, at 19.10, Felicia P wrote: > > Hello, I see that ISC updated terminology for BIND9 to use primary/secondary > in addition to the original master/slave which many projects have been > deprecating. > > In the context of BIND9, it seems that 'primary/secondary' is less clear than

Re: "lame-servers: info: no valid RRSIG resolving ..."

2020-04-17 Thread btb via bind-users
delays, increase code complexity, >and prevent deployment of new DNS features. See >https://dnsflagday.net for further details. [GL #150] > > BIND 9.14.0 is the first non development version with this behaviour. > > Mark > >>

"lame-servers: info: no valid RRSIG resolving ..."

2020-04-17 Thread btb via bind-users
hi- i'm seeing what i'm wondering if is a lot of "lame-servers: info: no valid RRSIG resolving ..." messages in the logs [on average ~500 messages per day]. a small snippet: 15-Apr-2020 18:11:46.057 lame-servers: info: no valid RRSIG resolving 'jwplayer.com/DS/IN': 192.5.6.30#53 15-Apr-2020 1

static stub zone not working as expected

2019-07-11 Thread btb via bind-users
hi- i have an environment which over time has managed to accumulate various "internal" zones [in this specific case, "foo.local"]. eventually, these zones will be phased out, but unfortunately in the interim, i'm stuck with this. i'm attempting to configure them as static-stub zones: zone "f

Re: Problem w/ Forwarding Zone in Caching-Only Config

2017-06-27 Thread btb via bind-users
On 6/27/17 12:13 PM, Michael W. Fleming wrote: We're setting up a wireless printing service that uses Zeroconf/bonjour/rendevouz dns entries. The product, Presto, has it's own dns server for a private, on-campus only zone (presto.). We're running bind 9.9 with a master server, three slaves and tw