Re: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-28 Thread brett smith
, Brett On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:29 PM, brett smith wrote: > >> Yes tuning off IPTABLES conn-tracking makes a huge difference. I also >> followed: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/304713 >> h

Re: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-22 Thread brett smith
ct 20, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stuart Browne wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: bind-users-bounces+stuart.browne=ausregistry.com...@lists.isc.org >> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+stuart.browne=ausregistry.com...@lists.isc.org] >> On Behalf Of brett smith >&g

Re: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-19 Thread brett smith
When all the Windows PC's are switched to our resolver, bind stops responding. rndc querylog shows queries coming thru, I changed tcp-clients from 1000 to 1 but DNS seems lagging, so we switched back to the original Windows Domain resolver. Besides increasing open files tuning, what TCP / sysc

Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-18 Thread brett smith
I need to build a pair DNS cache servers to support 5000+ clients ( PC's and Servers ). I have been looking for some guides on tuning BIND and the OS for Enterprise performance rather than the defaults. The version of bind is bind-9.8.2. Thank You, Brett __