So I'm been having dns issues for a while, differing issues that pop
up and I knock them down , but another just came to my attention which
has me stumped.
My external zone config has allow-recursion ( none; );
However I have some 3rd party sites that I CNAME too. Akamai for
example, yes CNAME to
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> Odds are good this is a software bug in BIND.
>
> I can absolutely confirm that this is a bug in BIND 9; we're aware of
> it and have been trying to reproduce it for some time. Unfortunately
> it seems to be triggered by some environmental cond
> So that was the trace between the client and the nameserver. What
> about the trace between the nameserver and the rest of the world?
>
> The log message is trigger by multiple queries from your nameserver
> not being answered and named falling back simpler queries in a
> attempt to get them ans
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Tory M. Blue:
>
>> [tblue@mx3 ~]$ dig @problemserver.net www.yahoo.com +trace
>
> Please use "dig @problemserver.net www.yahoo.com +trace +norecurse
> +dnssec", to match more closely the queires that BIND
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article SNIPPED<
> www.yahoo.com. 300 IN CNAME fp.wg1.b.yahoo.com.
>
> And even when they did, it didn't get involved until you followed the
> CNAME returned for www.yahoo.com. Your log message above indicates an
> issue just with th
Second email in a single day, crazy. But I've had issues backing up
and just need to resolve them
Again Bind bind-9.7.2-P3 behind F5 Loadbalancers.
I'm running into an issue where one of the 2 servers will resolve
www.yahoo.com but the other will not (Same network), but both will
resolve yahoo.c
Hey all,
Well I'm reaching out as I'm at a loss. I have a distributed DNS
architecture with 2 bind-9.7.2-P3 servers behind an F5 Loadbalancer. I
then have another 2 behind another F5 at another location.
My app servers are configured with their resolv.conf looking like:
(please ignore the domain
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> There are probably at least a half dozen queries that occur in
> performing that command. Which of these resulted in the "No such name"
> response?
>
> What was in the Question section of that response, i.e. specifically
> which name did
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Tory M Blue wrote:
>
>> I've running into some issues and trying to diagnose, so maybe folks
>> on here can help me with steps to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Bind 9.6.1-P1
>> Fedora Cor
I've running into some issues and trying to diagnose, so maybe folks
on here can help me with steps to troubleshoot.
Bind 9.6.1-P1
Fedora Core
What I am experiencing and led to my investigation is a random 5
second delay in name resolution. Now I know that nslookup/dig resolver
has a default 5 se
10 matches
Mail list logo
