Hiya,
On 29/01/2025 02:58, Michael De Roover wrote:
I appreciate the confirmation of this being about DoT/DoH
Do we have any opinions as to whether the document (which
I've not read, sorry;-) has anything to say about ADoT?
Ta,
S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
Hiya,
On 20/06/2024 14:34, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Stephen,
you actually gave me an idea - you should use BIND version without HTTPS record
support and just convert the records to TYPExxx form. That way, there will be no
parser standing in your way and you can put all kind of rubbish to the zone.
Hi again,
Actually, it may well be that bind allows me sufficient
leeway to do most of the tests I want, so this is just
to check that there's no imminent plan to have bind
disallow the kind of rubbish HTTPS RRs below. If that's
not likely to change in the next few months, then I'd
say I'm fine.
Hiya,
Thanks all for the info/suggestions. I guess I'll have
to try what Ondřej suggests or something similar, and
that's ok.
Cheers,
S.
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Visit https://lists.isc.or
Hiya,
Apologies if this is a repeat, I spent a bit of time looking
but didn't find stuff...
I'd like to publish various HTTPS RRs with dodgy encodings
in order to test which clients handle things well or badly.
Were it possible to use nsupdate for that, that'd make my
life simpler, but I've no
5 matches
Mail list logo
