is list wanting to test the zones for themselves, ping me off list
and I can get you a signup for six months free of charge — perhaps longer if we
can come up with suitable reasons why. Just don’t tell a grumpy engineer who
may be on this list to
proper troubleshooting would involve checking what each of the
authoriatatives say. But it’s Sunday and the dogs need a walk.
:-)
Simon
> On 16 Jun 2019, at 09:43, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
> I have discovered Friday that the following domain used by Barclays bank in
> UK doesn
Thanks Warren. Are we support this with our current release?
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM Leroy Tennison
wrote:
> Before selecting round robin consider the drawbacks - a DNS server being
> down, DNS server inconsistency, an application expecting some kind of
>
h case, once the
IP address is given out, it goes to the end of the list. The fourth user,
therefore, will be sent to the first IP address, and so forth.
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY wrote:
>
&
Hi,
Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC
application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration
to support Load Balancing?
Rgds
Simon
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Thanks a lot Warren .
Can you please write me the steps to make the bind only as a resolver . It
will be great if you could send me if there is any document .
Rgds
Simon
On Wednesday, February 21, 2018, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:06 PM, SIMON BABY wrote:
>
Hi,
1. Can I use BIND9, for implementing only the client resolve/validation
part? My system has limited memory and CPU power.
2. In the client resolution part, can i send the queries directly to any of
the root servers? Instead of any public name server.
Rgds
Simon
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at
Thanks Evan for answering my questions. I will look more into getdns-api or
libunbund library for the client side resolve.
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:33:10PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > 1. Assume if I use an external
Thanks Warren. I will look into https://getdnsapi.net/ .
Rgds
simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:42 PM, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > Hello Evan,
> >
> > Thank you so much for the quick response.
> >
> > My req
. Can I integrate dnsmasq option with my client application? Any reference.
Thanks once again for your help and time.
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:42:26PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > My requirement is to implement only the
my application to send queries
and validate the answer in my client code itself. Can you please point if
any sample code.
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:08:18PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > I am trying to implement the full
Hello,
I am trying to implement the full recursive resolver with libbind library
in my client code. I am not using resolv.conf in my implementation. Can
anyone please help to point any sample code for this.
Thank you for your help and time.
Rgds
simon
Akamai users (so the smaller
players).
ISC is aware of the issue. I do not believe that the cause has been identified.
Simon
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-us
On 21 May 2014, at 13:01, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Probably because there is no DS record for ise.gov, which prevents the
> validator to try.
Thanks, and indeed no DS in .gov, knew I was missing something basic.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc
Dear Bind Users,
BIND 9 logs report: RRSIG has expired for "www.ise.gov"
And "no valid signature found" for "ise.gov A".
Yet I can still resolve and visit the website http://ise.gov/
DNS recursive server has:
dnssec-validation yes;
dnssec-enable yes;
dnssec-accept-expired
Put another way, if you subscribe to the rsync
service for 10,000 users and decide to repurpose the data to make it available
to the same audience via RPZ, your call.
For the record, I work for the commercial arm of Spamhaus[1].
All the best
Simon
[1] As this statement may get some people ra
e mail
server I'm sending from is in your DCC database.)
> I suspect a real (as opposed to synthetic) DNSBL has
> a lot of repetition in all except the last labels.
Yeah. Depends on the DNSBL. But not in this case.
Nonetheless, Tony's stats were interesting.
ATB
Simon
signatur
On 23 Sep 2013, at 19:24, Tony Finch wrote:
> Simon Forster wrote:
>>
>> As a matter of interest, if one had a DNSBL with 5.5 million entries
>> (i.e. 5.5 million IPs):
>>
>> 1) What needs to be done to rewrite that to a BIND zone?
>> 2) What sort of
of interest, if one had a DNSBL with 5.5 million entries (i.e. 5.5
million IPs):
1) What needs to be done to rewrite that to a BIND zone?
2) What sort of machine would be required to load that zone?
3) How long would it take to load into BIND?
TIA
Simon
>> I was looking for somethin
e in beta while minor
tweaks are made to the production process.
Customers now should see updates to the DBL zone file every 3 minutes and
updates to the DROP zone every 15 minutes. Additionally, the latency between
zone updates and zone propagation has been reduced by two minutes.
ATB
Simon Forster
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:40:31 +0800, MyDots.net wrote:
Hi,
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example
Thanks for the replies, everyone; I think the consensus is that having ARIN
redelegate is the correct solution, and that's fine by me. (As mentioned, my
marching orders were to do this without redelegating, but if that's the
correct way to do it, I can make that case.)
-Simon
On T
in 0 ms
What really baffles me is that this worked for several hours yesterday, and
apparently quit overnight. One option is just to change the delegation at
ARIN, but we want to avoid that and in any event I'd like to know what the
issue is. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
-Simon
_
m=117310800721413&w=2
> If I delete this domain from the list of zones served by this BIND, I
> get the AD bit again.
>
> Is it normal? Should the client be happy with just the AA bit?
Last time I checked they weren't, but things may have changed.
Simon
24 matches
Mail list logo
