https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> ___ Please visit
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/lis
dy been mentioned here).
There are a lot of ugly things ISP's do to DNS; I loathe all of them.
I suspect many customers do to.
- --
*Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS |-*O*-
||_// Biomedical
3676]: command
> channel listening on ::1#953 Sep 19 15:22:13 PROD55-DNS2
> named[3676]: the working directory is not writable
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med.
ugh...
>
> - Kevin ___ Please
> visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
- --
- _
t; the
>>>> EDNS0,</div><div><br></div><div&=
>>>> gt;Where do I find this EDNS statem=3D > ent in
>>>> Sunos</div><div><br><br><div
>>>> class= =3D3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Se
the ttl's timeout, resolvers with the old nameservers cached
> will still query them. Once the ttl's time out the new servers will
> be queried.
>
> Hope this helps,
Incidentally I use NameCheap as a registrar, and have noted that their
help pages are pretty easy to understa
sting.
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/EI-Academic Svcs. - ADMC 450, Newark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
__
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y
one server and sometimes another.
Generally with SSH you care what you're connecting to and will also have
individual records for each host to use for that purpose.
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |_
n spoofing attacks.
>
> In fact, the BIND 9 documentation contains a sample blackhole ACL
> which, until recently, specifically recommended filtering addresses
> in that block. The advice is outdated but I think someone is still
> following it.
- --
- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |
- and this makes bind slow to start, and
> use more RAM.
Do you know what version that arrived in? 9.8.0?
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\_
I do this. There may now be a smarter way, but I have a small number so this is
manageable for me: configure zones for each of the evil zones. Your server will
appear authoritative and you can direct clients wherever you like. I direct
some of mine to a virtualhost handing out 503 errors.
-- Se
gt;
>
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
- --
- -
t. If bind is not going to be
using over 4GB of RAM by itself, my understanding is that running 64-bit
will merely add overhead. I realize that is a pretty big generalization,
so feel free to correct me if you know better.
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novo
ailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use
k:
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-bind9-named-configure-views/
...the end result of which (just to check my own knowledge) is the same
as a split DNS, just without needing a second set of server
'dig' is a better tool in every way, I think. dig
host.example.com I believe is the syntax there.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On Apr 7, 2011 1:02, mee thun wrote:
Good Morning..
I am new member in this mailing list. I need help to change the query type in
the nslookup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are a lot of unfortunate practices one can find in DNS names. I'd
personally recommend not doing anything that conflicts with the RFC. At
my place of business, we slave a zone from a group that has underscores
in the hostnames which is also not a
that:
a: firewalls with ALGs are the devil
b: this goes double for PIX / ASA and
c: doubled again for putting them in front of servers, especially DNS
servers
W
On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A couple more gems:
https
with a * the subtle difference between
versions of that firewall firmware. I can't find that table anywhere --
was HTML, not in a PDF.
On 02/23/2011 11:39 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Take a look at this. It is somewhat confusing, but it is helpful and
> should tell you right
YrrV6GNslN5qicuHIehriQIMPdXs3/e2ZhB3h944kpymqL ag3tCg==
>>
>> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
>> vwall1a.nyc.gov.86400IN A161.185.1.3
>> vwall2a.nyc.gov.86400INA161.185.1.12
>> vwall3a.nyc.gov.86400INA167.153.130.12
>> vwall4a.nyc.g
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+xhuang=graphnet@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+xhuang=graphnet@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> Ryan Novosielski
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 5:47 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject:
t;
>
> Xiao
>
> 2/16/2011
>
>
>
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosiel
gt; not, you've got bigger problems.
>>>
>>> If you're not talking about a huge amount of data here (and from what
>>> you've described in previous posts, you're not) then you are fairly
>>> dramatically over-architecting your solution here. Per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2011 01:21 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 04:19 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>> health.nyc.gov query-errors:
>>>
>>> 10-Feb-2011 15:32:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2011 04:19 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> health.nyc.gov query-errors:
>>
>> 10-Feb-2011 15:32:30.682 query-errors: debug 1: client
>> 130.219.34.129#55935:
servers which will
> answer and claim no MX records exist:
OK, thanks -- I did not carefully check other locations for that one.
Good to know that's not just me.
- --
- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2011 03:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> dig: isc_socket_create: address family not supported
>>
>> I've read that I shouldn't let this error message lead me
ually works from my laptop against
the server (but dig by itself returns no MX records).
Thank you in advance for suggestions. This one is causing some nasty
problems.
- --
- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| |
29 matches
Mail list logo