sorry for the noise that would have been bind9-dev
Ron Hall
Senior System Administrator
IT Services - NCS
Core Infrastructure & Applications
514 398 3718
From: bind-users on behalf of Petr Menšík
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 8:43:55 AM
To: Ondřej Surý
bind9- if were voting
Ron Hall
Senior System Administrator
IT Services - NCS
Core Infrastructure & Applications
514 398 3718
From: bind-users on behalf of Petr Menšík
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 8:43:55 AM
To: Ondřej Surý
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc
allow-update { none; };
};
Is it possible to confirm that this is supposed to work in BIND 9.16?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of
org<mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Ron Hall
Senior System Administrator, NCS - Core Infrastructure Applications
IT Services
T: +1 514 398 3718
ron.h...@mcgill.ca<mailto:ron.h...@mcgill.ca> |
www.mcgill.ca/it<https://mcgi
t Resolving (wbr...@e1b.org)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Alan Clegg
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:13:17 -0500
> Subject: Re: bind-users Digest, Vol 2770, Issue 2
>
>
> On 11/21/17 12:05 PM, Ron
n Not Resolving
> (Reindl Harald)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "G.W. Haywood"
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:42:12 + (GMT)
> Subject: Re: Domain Not Resolving
> Hi there,
>
>
is was working – why did it just stop? Who is to
blame? Can any of you list members see any thing wrong with the previously
included zone file?
Thanks,
Ron W.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Ron
Wingfield <ron.wingfi...@archaxis.net>
wrote:
I am having difficulty
configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
for over a year bet
I am having difficulty configuring reverse
DNS. This has been a problem for over a year between my
server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I cannot eMail
to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL. Very
broadcast.archaxis.net.
-----
Ron Wingfield,
CEO WaterMark Marine Industries, Inc.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
;82 3600 IN PTR bravo.archaxis.net. ; (an alternate server)
;87 3600 IN PTR broadcast.archaxis.net.
OTTF,
Ron Wingfield,
CEO WaterMark
riven emergency plan, where we put
entries in /etc/hosts files whenever a situation like this happens.
Not an ideal solution.
> A secondary value of TTLs is that they'll keep the cache from filling up
> with names from domains that have been abandoned completely. That's why
>
> resolver take care of all the caching.
That's indeed my situation, we're running around 50 Linux machines each
having their own caching named. And a few Windows/OSX laptops which
run off Google DNS.
It's all very annoying, but it's even more annoying for our
automate that.
But I'm afraid that's not gonna fly.
Ron
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
> By “upstream” I assume you’re talking about forwarders. If your forwarders
> are flakey, have you ever considered simply **not*forwarding**? That
> would
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> How about a list of domains for which cached RRs will not be purged
> _unless_ a different RR is supplied by the 'upstream' server?
>
Or, with Barry Margolin's comments in mind, a dynamic list, which is
compiled from th
In general you're right of course,
but in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his DNS servers
working, and we just want to keep the connectivity.
For various reasons it's not that easy to switch to a new supplier,
and in any case we need an intermediate solution.
Ro
Hi,
subject says all. Read manpages, could not find this in the FAQ's.
Hope this is possible. If not does anyone know of other name servers
that offer this option?
Thanks,
Ron Arts
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> On 3/17/2016 12:36:31 +0100 Ron wrote:
>
> Can bind be configured to not drop RR's from the cache when
>>> the upstream DNS server is unresponsive?
>>>
>>
> Hi,
>>
>> subject says
Dave,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2016-03-18 01:46, Ron wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Haywood
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
>>
>>> ... in this case
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 AM, G.W. Haywood
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Ron wrote:
>
> ... in this case it's a supplier who is unable to keeps his DNS servers
>> working, and we just want to keep the connectivity.
>>
>
> I'd just put
Slave the zone? Oh, run secondary. Fat chance.
Ron
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
> Would they be receptive to letting you slave the zone? At least then you’d
> have the whole EXPIRE time before the names stopped resolving.
>
>
>
> If they’re concer
l update this is if your MX record(or backup
MX record) points to this ip address and then they should honor a
request to set the reverse lookup for you.
Lyle Giese
LCR Computer Services, Inc.
On 9/22/2015 2:08 PM, Ron Wingfield wrote:
RE: BIND v9.10.2
I
"? The configuration scenario previously worked
since 2002. Can someone suggest a fix?
Thanks,
Ron W.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bi
thout disabling validation altogether until they fix their issues. I've
tried setting ojp.usdoj.gov as a forward zone and forwarding to a
non-validating resolver, but that doesn't seem to work.
Ron Dodson
Sr. Network Engineer
ron.dod...@lmco.com<mailto:ron.dod...@lmco
24 matches
Mail list logo
