* Rick Dicaire:
> There's also a freely available service and API at https://ip-api.com
> you may find useful.
I am a bit freaked out by the fact that both MaxMind (IPv6) and ip-api
(IPv4) were spot on with their reported locations a few minutes ago. We
are talking about two "hits" within a 10km
* Tim Daneliuk via bind-users:
> But it did "provoke" a question. Does anyone think not restarting
> *anything* for 10 years is a good idea?
This isn't really BIND-related, so a different mailing list might be
better suited for discussing the issue of ultra high availability.
If you are interest
* Tony Finch:
> I think a procedure like this is a good way to migrate a primary
> server if the old and new servers are run by the same people [...]
After reading your message I think that we used pretty much the same
approach, although I am fortunate for not having to work under time
pressure.
Hello list members.
Imagine a BIND9 master-and-slave pair (let's call them Alpha and Omega,
respectively) with automatic synchronisation in place. Imagine further
that Alpha needs to be replaced by a brand new server Beta hosted in a
different data center, which implies new hardware and IP-adresse
* Tim Daneliuk via bind-users:
> I believe the DS record is what I have to provide my registrar as I
> understand it.
That depends on the top level domain. For example, .de uses DS records,
while .com uses DNSKEY reords. Best to ask your registrar.
-Ralph
* techli...@phpcoderusa.com:
> I had my ISP configure a reverse lookup years ago. They say they no
> longer offer that service and there is no reverse lookup for my IP.
And what exactly is "my IP"? One could hazard a guess based on your
message's headers, but it would be easier if you told us.
>
* Jakob Dhondt:
> I have just noticed that when using dig (different versions) on Mac OS
> (High Sierra) over IPv6 the source port is not randomized.
I may be having a senior moment, but don't IPv6 privacy extensions cover
address randomization rather than port randomization?
-Ralph
On 07.12.2017 22:33, Douglas C. Stephens wrote:
> My research found that only DS records for the child zone's KSK(s)
> needed to be put into the parent zone.
That's what I thought, thank you for your confirmation.
-Ralph
___
Please visit https://lists.
Hello list members.
I use the following configuration for a domain-subdomain pair:
zone "example.com" IN {
type master;
file "pri/example.com.zone";
auto-dnssec maintain;
inline-signing yes;
};
zone "subdom.example.com" IN {
type master;
file "pri/subdom
9 matches
Mail list logo
