Re: ECS subnet

> Am 14.02.2025 um 17:39 schrieb Greg Choules > : > > Hi. > Is this a question about BIND, or Unbound? > Note the name of the list. No, it’s a question about BIND. If an upstream resolver sends an ECS subnet (it’s in the packet header somewhere, from what I understand) - how can BIND show

ECS subnet

Hi, I have a setup where I have a BIND resolver behind an unbound resolver. The reason is that when I originally set this up, there was no way to integrate an RPZ feed into unbound. It seems possible now but I haven’t really wanted to try it out…. Of course, this leads to the situation where

Re: Problem with a certain domain

https://intodns.com/mallorcazeitung.es They have to fix this first, IMHO. And that doesn’t take into account the problems found by zonemaster. https://zonemaster.net/en/result/1041e4ac095c7018 > Am 01.06.2024 um 12:08 schrieb Thomas Barth via bind-users > : > > Am 2024-06-01 04:34, sc

Re: 9.18 BIND not iterated over all authoritative nameservers

> Am 30.10.2023 um 16:59 schrieb Michael Martinell via bind-users > : > > Thanks to all who responded. Putting qname-minimization disabled; in > named.conf resolves the issue in my testing. > > I did try specifying relaxed (which appears to be the default), but that > didn’t work either. >

Re: Problem resolving a domain

Hi, Thanks for the hints! It does indeed work with these settings. The problem is also that google and quad9 and most of the rest of the internet seem to be able to resolve it. While I investigated this issue, I came around a posting from one or two years ago where similar problems with Ba

Problem resolving a domain

Hi, at work, I have a problem resolving the following domain: myapplication.international.barclays.com BIND 9.16.27, FreeBSD 12.3-P5. 2022Q2 ports. I copied the config to a VM at home - but it did not work there, either. I believe it must have happened on the update from BIND 9.16.26 to 9.16