DNS DevRoom at FOSDEM2024 - Call for Participation

Hello DNS enthusiasts and other developers, After four earlier successful and packed DNS devrooms, we are happy to announce a half-day DNS devroom at FOSDEM 2024. As with the previous events, we hope to host talks anywhere from hardcore protocol stuff, to practical sessions for programmers that a

Re: RPZ zone response delay time ?

` on Linux) that goes to your local system. 0.0.0.0 is not the right DNS response here, or almost anywhere. NXDOMAIN likely fits better. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from t

Re: BIND caching of nxdomain responses

tps://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2021-September/021362.html Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC fu

Re: BIND 9.10.4 may have a fatal crash defect.

Hello, On 12 May 2016, at 15:44, Peter van Dijk wrote: I’ve heard two proposals: (1) brew fakes up a version number X that sorts 9.10.4 < X < Y, where Y is whatever ISC is going to release next (2) ISC ‘clones’ 9.10.3-P4 into 9.10.5 (or 9.10.4-P1 but that seems wrong) so the highest v

Re: BIND 9.10.4 may have a fatal crash defect.

othing increases the odds of somebody running into the crash but one might argue that this is helpful! I think all three options are a bit ugly, to be fair. I don’t have any preference. Thoughts? Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerd