RE: named-checkzone

2010-06-28 Thread P.A
kzone. Hope this helps someone in the future. paul From: bind-users-bounces+gord.taylor=rbc@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+gord.taylor=rbc@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of P.A Sent: 2010, June, 24 3:47 PM To: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: named-chec

named-checkzone

2010-06-24 Thread P.A
[mailto:gord.tay...@rbc.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:32 PM To: P.A; bind-us...@isc.org Subject: RE: named-checkzone My suggestion is to create a backup copy of the (current) zone files in another directory. Only allow the users to edit those files, then execute a shell script that checks

named-checkzone

2010-06-24 Thread P.A
Hi, im trying to get some ideas how I can exec named-checkzone on a zone file that has just been executed. We have com users who edit zone files but forget to run the command when they are do editing the file. Trying to figure out if anyone has a good way of enforcing that the zone gets checked af

RE: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!

2010-05-10 Thread P.A
eneration of BIND 9 than 9.4-ESV-R1? - Kevin On 5/10/2010 10:58 AM, P.A wrote: > Stephane, do you think I can get away with running 9.4.3-P5 that doesn't > seem to have an

RE: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!

2010-05-10 Thread P.A
ginal Message- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 10:24 AM To: P.A Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: KAMINSKY vulnerability !! On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05:47AM -0400, P.A wrote a message of 242 lines which said: > My question is di

RE: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!

2010-05-10 Thread P.A
I think I see what the issue is, http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/725188 I was asking about kaminsky because I wasn't sure if I had previously upgraded to fix that fix, which seems like I had and the problem is something different. From: P.A [mailto:ra...@meganet.net] Sent: Monday

KAMINSKY vulnerability !!

2010-05-10 Thread P.A
Hi, list. Today I came in and both my name server stopped answering queries. I restarted the servers a couple of times and they are now up. I have posted the primary/slave look below. My question is did I just get rid by the kaminsky vulnerability? if so how can I determined what host caused th