On 04-Jan-2025 21:21 CET, wrote:
> I'm setting up a new, non-recursive, authoritative secondary
> nameserver using FreeBSD 12.2 and bind9.18.32. It works to the
> extent that runs and answers queries correctly, but attempts to use
>
> bob@pelorus:/usr/local/etc/namedb/slave % named-checkzone -d
Are you sure it's not your setup?
I have plenty of dig running on FreeBSD (with bind-utils 9.14) and also Debian
and they work just fine.
--
Nico
> On 21 Jun 2019, at 09:14, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> In message <9ba154cc-2272-46ec-a793-47ff31dca...@arin.net>, you wrote:
>
>> Hi Ronald,
On 19-Feb-2019 20:00 CET, wrote:
> Agree with Tony on TCP not going to be tried. Have you looked at using
> anycast? It is not true load balancing but it allows you to stand up
> multiple DNS servers that “shares” a single IP address.
or just use a software load-balancer which has been designed
Hi Ramesh,
On 23-Jan-2019 07:03 CET, wrote:
> Greetings,
> Is anyone knows unbound 1.9 release date?
>
> Regards,
> Ramesh
Did you ask on the Unbound-users mailing list?
https://nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
That would be more appropriated than a Bind mailing-list I believe.
Ch
>
> On 18 May 2018, at 16:16, Blason R wrote:
>
> why? is there any logic in this?
>
> yeah management does not want to allow direct syncing with master as they
> dont want to expose any info to them.
Interesting statement - especially since the slave servers will serve the exact
same dat
Hi Roberto,
> On 17 May 2018, at 16:25, Roberto Carna wrote:
>
> Dear Tony, so you say that it's impossible what I want...
>
> In this scenario that my two DNS servers respond queries at the same
> time, suppose the primary server goes downhow do clients know that
> they have to query the s
Hi Roberto,
> On 17 May 2018, at 16:06, Roberto Carna wrote:
>
> Hi people, I've implemented two BIND9 servers for my company, one as
> primary public DNS server and the other as secondary public DNS
> server.
>
> I always believed that all the client queries coming from Internet go
> to the DN
Hi Paul,
> On 17 May 2018, at 13:46, Paul Roberts wrote:
>
> Good grief indeed!
>
> I would love to implement 'fetches-per-zone' but we need to get them onto
> BIND 9.11 first, that's a few months away.
>
> Unfortunately I can't just block this traffic else I'll have the security
> teams wan
Hi Lars,
On 26-Apr-2017 09:10 CEST, wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 08:22 schrieb Steven Carr:
> > On 26 April 2017 at 06:53, Dr. Lars Hanke wrote:
> > > allow-transfer { 172.16.11.35; };
> > This IP ^^^
> >
> > > transfer of '178.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 172.16.10.16#53: failed
> > > while
>
On 19-Apr-2017 16:47 BST, wrote:
> On 19-Apr-2017 15:59 BST, wrote:
> [...]
> > I'd also like to see if it's possible to have dig send ECS info.
>
> +edns / +noedns , but you'll need a recent dig version.
Of course I meant +subnet / +nosubnet
--
Nico
Hi Grant,
On 19-Apr-2017 15:59 BST, wrote:
> On 04/19/2017 03:37 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> > This is what the EDNS client subnet option is about. You can use it in
> > BIND by adding "ecs" clauses to your address match lists for views or
> > acls. However it isn't documented in the ARM and it has
Hi Per,
> On 2 Oct 2016, at 19:07, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Just use the "hint" type configuration. This is just fine for most users.
>
> The interesting thing is why FreeBSD includes the recommendation in the
> default named.conf if that is not good, and I thought it would be
On 5 August 2016 at 09:15:29, Harshith Mulky (harshith.mu...@outlook.com) wrote:
Hello Nico,
This was only for Testing between 2 devices, 1 supporting edns and the other
not supporting edns and checking how the Application behaves(lwresd and named)
OK.
Better also answering on the mailing lis
Hi Harshith,
> On 05 Aug 2016, at 08:47, Harshith Mulky wrote:
>
> I have tried enabling with the significant bits
>
> server 0.0.0.0/0 { edns no; };
> server ::/0 { edns no; };
>
> But, I get the following Error
> Error in named configuration:
> /etc/named.conf:120: '{' expected near '/'
>
>
Hi Harshith,
On 20 June 2016 at 15:05:58, Harshith Mulky (harshith.mu...@outlook.com) wrote:
I am Running bind (bind-9.9.5P1-2.2.2.x86_64) on Open Suse 13.2
I have the following Records in my Zone file
$ORIGIN test1.com.
$TTL 600
@ IN SOA atlanta.test1.com. admin.test1.com. (
Hi Sotiris,
On 1 June 2016 at 14:47:31, Sotiris Tsimbonis (sts...@forthnet.gr) wrote:
On 1/6/16 15:30, Kevin Kretz wrote:
> There's also no reason to assume that the different responses have
> anything to do with the client network. They could, of course (with
> views), but that you get differe
Hi Bert,
On 9 May 2016 at 21:24:42, bert hubert (bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl) wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:24:50PM +0200, Nico CARTRON wrote:
> > Perhaps you should tell us how it works for you, what your testing has
> > found, and contribute to the development of great open sou
Hi Bert,
On 9 May 2016 at 17:11:54, bert hubert (bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl) wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:38:13PM +0200, Nico CARTRON wrote:
> I was wondering whether some folks on the mailing list had a look at the ECS
> implementation in BIND 9.11,
> and if they had any feedback
Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether some folks on the mailing list had a look at the ECS
implementation in BIND 9.11,
and if they had any feedback to share?
Cheers,
--
Nico
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsub
19 matches
Mail list logo
