5 sec TTL, with a lot of load balancer based rules. on a lot of servers…..
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>>
>> our parent org, owns the parent zone, and this zone is delegated from there
>> to a load b
> - Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Nex6|Bill
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 3:05 PM
> To: Barry Margolin
> Cc: comp-protoc
, so i am going to put a forward
zone directly from my NS to the load balancer which is auth for the zone. that
way, if the internet gateway is down or has issues the application will still
function.
-Nex6
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:35 AM, N
My name server is not authoritative for it. but i want to verify once the
forward is in place the query is following the
forward and not the authoritative path.
On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Nex6|Bill wrote:
>
>> I am going to be adding
I am going to be adding a type forward zone for an important zone. how can i
test that the forward is working correctly? if i do a dig against the NS the
record will return no matter if its auth or fwd zone.
-Nex6
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_
.
>
>Since you asked the question, what would you propose as an alternative
>for folks running multiple sets of nameservers with different info on them?
>
>John
>
>
>On 06/02/2014 04:52 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>> so, stub zones allow you to point a zone to a different name
recently, a question came up about "stub" zones came up and what they are and
are they part of the DNS standards or are they a good idea. i said, they are
evil and should not be used if you can avoid it. they way I understand them is
the are when you create local zones for zones you are NOT aut
7 matches
Mail list logo
