On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Matthew Horsfall (alh)
wrote:
> Attempting to 'dig' for 'md' does something really weird. What am I missing?
Ah, md is an obsolete RRTYPE. Nevermind! (Just like typing "dig a".)
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
_
392353INNSf.root-servers.net.
.392353INNSe.root-servers.net.
;; Query time: 29 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)
;; WHEN: Mon Jul 27 12:17:40 EDT 2015
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 239
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
___
only "rndc reload" works. But I can't use it pointing to a single
> domain.
rndc reload works if the zone is in the default view. If it's
in another view, you have to specify it:
rndc reload mydomain.com IN someview
Is this the case for your zone?
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh
SS
field) is the number of octets of the largest UDP payload that can
be reassembled and delivered in the sender's network stack. Note
that path MTU, with or without fragmentation, may be smaller than
this.
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
___
By default it ignores the searchlist in /etc/resolv.conf.
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> Hello,
>
> I was curious if the underlying protocol used by the rndc command was
> well
> documented and if writing clients against it (rather than using the
> rndc
> utility) was advisable or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
I've wr
On 10/05/2012 10:45 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Matthew Horsfall (alh)
wrote:
Hello,
I was curious if the underlying protocol used by the rndc command was well
documented and if writing clients against it (rather than using the rndc
utility) was advisable or not
Hello,
I was curious if the underlying protocol used by the rndc command was well
documented and if writing clients against it (rather than using the rndc
utility) was advisable or not.
Thanks,
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
___
Please visit https
8 matches
Mail list logo