Until a few hours ago, I had several domains and 3 nameservers for them:
ns1.virtualbit.it (master, 136.243.232.142)
ns11.virtualbit.it (slave, 158.69.210.19)
ns2.virtualbit.it (slave, 136.243.232.143)
Then I tried to migrate to a new master, names.virtualbit.it (46.4.38.130).
Here is the migrati
I'm not sure this feature exists, and, even then, I don't know how it's
called.
I need my Bind to resolve names to different IP addresses based on the
subnet the request comes from.
E.g. I have a Bind instance on a Debian virtual server 10.7.33.111
(network 10.7.33.0/24). Then I have a web s
Il 13/07/2015 20:47, John Miller ha scritto:
the zone being expired is the most likely. Check everything:
- physical connectivity between ns2 and ns1
That was the problem. I recently changed iptables rules on ns1 and
forgot to test this little thing. The other zones weren't failing
becaus
Il 13/07/2015 20:21, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
zone transerfs are retried often, but that don't help with such low
expire times, the question still remains why they are failing on the
same host, but that's not a bind problem
I'm pretty sure it's not a bind problem (I'm not pretending it's
Il 13/07/2015 19:51, Darcy Kevin (FCA) ha scritto:
Half an hour is ridiculous, to be honest. Unless you have 24x7x365
eyes-on-glass looking for zone transfer failures *constantly* and
ready and able to *instantly* pounce on any such problems and fix them
within minutes.
You have been persuas
Il 13/07/2015 19:21, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
check if the zone failed to update from the master and has expired,
been there due a cisco router with "DNS ALG" enabled leading only a
few large zones fail to transfer
Yes the zone failed to update, I know because if I raise the seqno @ns1,
Hello,
I have two nameservers, the master and its slave, and they work ok for
several zones. However for one of the zones (aquilacorde.com), the slave
replies with SERVFAIL, and I don't understand why.
The master is ns1.virtualbit.it, the slave is ns2.virtualbit.it.
I've tried enabling debug
On May 26, 2015 at 19:27, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
TTL and same subnet can't matter. I had in mind rather the warning
about the SOA MNAME.
You the man! I totally overlooked those messages by zonemaster just
because of their green background color, which was meaning to me "these
are the OK thi
Il 25/05/2015 15:39, Niall O'Reilly ha scritto:
On Mon, 25 May 2015 11:26:58 +0100,
Lucio Crusca wrote:
I moved my bind installation to a new server two weeks ago and I
copied the zones verbatim: on the old server everything was working
ok.
More precisely, you weren't aware of
Hello,
I moved my bind installation to a new server two weeks ago and I copied
the zones verbatim: on the old server everything was working ok.
The zone lists.granellodisenape.org hosts a mailing list (mailman). On
the new server, all mailing list users can use it except two of them:
they are
> Dumb question of the day: does this zone also handle DHCP
> entries?
No, it doesn't.
> I ask because I am wondering if you need to use rndc
> freeze/thaw.
Er... I don't know what rndc freeze/thaw even is...
___
Please visit https://lists.is
Hello all,
I have a Bind9 server which is master for several zones, one of those is
hcvalchisone.net. Here is the relevant part of its db file:
;
; BIND data file for hcvalchisone.net
;
$TTL3600
@ IN SOA hcvalchisone.net. info.hcvalchisone.net. (
20
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 11:25:59, Steven Carr ha scritto:
> On 10 February 2014 11:20, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> > Ok, so what should I do now? I want the NS records to point to
> > ns0|1.virtual-bit.com. Should I change anything in my zone file or should
> > I
> &
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 11:16:11, Steven Carr ha scritto:
> On 10 February 2014 11:10, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> > How did you find that NS servers are ns1.customer.seflow.it and
> > ns2.customer.seflow.it? They should be ns0.virtual-bit.com and
>
> > ns1.virtual-bit
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 09:41:26, Steven Carr ha scritto:
> On 10 February 2014 09:01, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> > Sorry, I thought I might be making some obvious mistake so that you
> > wouldn't need the actual zone to spot it.
> >
> > ;
> > ; BIND da
.58.168.152
nsa IN A 158.58.168.152
nsb IN A 158.58.168.193
vtiger IN A 158.58.168.152
shopIN A 158.58.168.152
lists IN CNAME softwareliberopinerolo.org.
>
> Mark
>
> In mes
Hello everybody,
I have a domain which fails since a few days ago when queried @8.8.8.8, but if
you query it @(its nameserver) it succeeds.
Here is my zone db
;
; BIND data file for domain.org
;
$TTL3600
@ IN SOA domain.org. info.domain.org. (
201
In data martedì 20 settembre 2011 15:25:03, Lightner, Jeff ha scritto:
> Can someone give me a better explanation of why this is saying my
> delegation failed than the FAQ does?
>
> In a separate thread I saw this recommendation to another user:
I'm the other user :)
> On going there and testing
Hello *,
I'm new here though I've been using bind for about 10 years. I've just
transferred a domain under the .it TLD for the first time.
Here in Italy we have nic.it that regulates the .it domain names registrations
and transfers.
The domain transfer went ok, and now I have access to the con
19 matches
Mail list logo
