Solved! Thank you.
On 26-11-2013 06:31, Phil Mayers wrote:
As Barry pointed out: no. This is an apex NS record. It's not a
delegation.
Valid delegations need to be below the zone; not *at* the zone. You
should also avoid delegating a name unless there's a matching zone SOA
on the far end.
On 25-11-2013 15:42, Phil Mayers wrote:
2. Put a proper zone cut (delegation) into your local master,
pointing at your authoritative server
Thanks Phil. Your help has been valuable.
I think this is exactly what I'm doing here:
Recursive Bind server - /etc/bind/db.fd00.f3e2.38a5:
$TTL
On 25-11-2013 14:22, Phil Mayers wrote:
No, because you told your recursive it was authoritative and gave it
an empty zone file.
Thank you Phil.
But it is a private network zone. The query cannot go to the DNS root
servers, must be forwarded to the authoritative server for the zone
(ns1.
Hi,
I'm enabling IPv6 dual stack in my network and my Bind authoritative
servers are working perfectly with the ip6.arpa zones.
But my Recursive DNS server cannot resolve the reverse zone records from
my private network. I tried to make a setup similar to what I do for my
private network (IP
point that I'm letting out?
Thanks for help.
--
Thiago Henrique
www.adminlinux.com.br
On 07-11-2013 06:56, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 6 Nov 2013, at 18:30, Listas wrote:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;f.1.4.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.0.0.0.5.a.8.3.2.e.3.e.0.0.c.f.ip6.arpa. IN
PTR
And place
Hi!
Are there size limits for zones of IPv6 reverse DNS ?
For example, is this a valid zone?
5.a.8.3.4.f.3.0.c.a.d.f.ip6.arpa
Thank you in advance!
--
Thiago Henrique
www.adminlinux.com.br
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bi
Hi,
I'm enabling IPv6 dual stack in my network and my Bind authoritative
servers are working perfectly with the ip6.arpa zones.
But my Recursive DNS server cannot resolve the reverse zone records from
my private network. I tried to make a setup similar to what I do for my
private network (IP
7 matches
Mail list logo
