Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query against this server, it
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query against this server, it
will respond with a "query refused" packet
JINMEI Tatuya / escreveu:
I strongly recommend you to upgrade to 9.5.1-P1. 9.5.0-P2 has several
known issues that can lead to SERVFAIL, and it's normally not very
easy to identify the cause. If you still see the problem with 9.5.1,
please report it again.
i have updated to 9.5.1-P
Hi,
Today, for some unknown reason, one of my servers which is running a
local DNS caching server (bind 9.5.0-P2) was answering SERVFAIL for a
specific host which i know exists and was working fine.
Maybe it was some temporary fail, some temporary internet connection
problem ..
Sener ATAS escreveu:
Hi,
I try to add slave dns server. But there is a problem about zone
transfer.
If I don't edit manually slave server's named.conf file, zone files
don't transfer from master to slave.
log file at slave dns is;
02-Jan-2009 16:40:03.226 notify: client 192.168.117.50#635
Peter Dambier escreveu:
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.
i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2 and got odd results.
9.5.0-P2 right after start. Not a single query was made to it, just
Gregory Hicks escreveu:
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for "too many timeouts resolving
''..." makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.
Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?
http://dns.measurement-factory.com/cgi-bin/openresolvercheck.pl
Peter Dambier escreveu:
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.
$ cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464
very
JINMEI Tatuya / escreveu:
question is is there something i can do to low bind's memory
usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ???
Admittedly, BIND9 tends to require a lot of memory. I'm not sure if
it can reasonably function with a total system
Hi,
i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a
RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT.
r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:29920 kB
the problem is that bind seems to consume a LOT of memory ... well,
a lot for low memory devices, i never
10 matches
Mail list logo
