Thank you all very much for the assistance!
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Lear, Karen (Evolver) wrote:
> Who would be responsible for opening a trouble report to GoDaddy? I don't
> understand exactly what the problem is here.
It looks, from the outside, as though the Oppe
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:12:43PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Bill Owens:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:55:12PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> These nameservers:
> >>
> >> dns2.oppedahl.com. 172800 IN A 208.109.255.50
> >> dns1.oppedahl.com. 172800 IN A
* Bill Owens:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:55:12PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> These nameservers:
>>
>> dns2.oppedahl.com. 172800 IN A 208.109.255.50
>> dns1.oppedahl.com. 172800 IN A 216.69.185.50
>>
>> return SERVFAIL for EDNS0 queries. COM contains a sig
Beginning sometime within the past few days, uspto.gov domain cannot resolve
oppedahl.com domain, but can resolve it from almost everywhere else. Some free
websites (http://centralops.net/co/) cannot resolve it as well. I want to
verify that uspto.gov doesn't need to correct anything on our en
Thanks.
From: bind-users-bounces+karen.lear=uspto@lists.isc.org
[bind-users-bounces+karen.lear=uspto@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Eivind
Olsen [eiv...@aminor.no]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:38 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: MX re
Can anyone tell me why my MX record for the coop-uspto.gov domain are IP
addresses instead of hostnames?
[klear@dns1 conf]$ nslookup
> set type=mx
> coop-uspto.gov
Server: 10.240.11.20
Address:10.240.11.20#53
Non-authoritative answer:
coop-uspto.gov mail exchanger = 5 151.207.12
30 IN A 199.169.197.30
pay.gov.30 IN NS ns1.twai.gov.
pay.gov.30 IN NS ns2.twai.gov.
;; Received 117 bytes from 199.169.192.28#53(NS2.TWAI.gov) in 74 ms
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari [mail
My recursive DNS servers are intermittently timing out and giving slow
responses to qa.pay.gov. I haven't noticed problems with any other sites. How
can I nail down where the problem is? From my home, on comast.net, I don't
have slowness or timeouts resolving qa.pay.gov.
Thx,
k
_
To clarify, I added this to the named.conf on the slave:
};
zone "usptoenews.gov" {
type slave;
file "secondaries/db.usptoenews";
masters { 10.240.6.50; };
};
________
From: Lear, Karen (Evolver)
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2
its config.
On 31/03/10 2:14, Lear, Karen (Evolver) wrote:
Can you tell me why I’m getting the message below on my slave server after
adding a master zone on the master server for usptoenews.gov:
[kl...@dns2 logs]$ grep enews activity.log
30-Mar-2010 17:17:45.484 notify: notice: client 10.240
Can you tell me why I'm getting the message below on my slave server after
adding a master zone on the master server for usptoenews.gov:
[kl...@dns2 logs]$ grep enews activity.log
30-Mar-2010 17:17:45.484 notify: notice: client 10.240.6.50#10738: received
notify for zone 'usptoenews.gov': TSIG '
:
;smtpedge1.uspto.gov. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
smtpedge1.uspto.gov.7200IN A 151.207.243.76
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Pounsett [mailto:m...@conundrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:15 PM
To: Lear, Karen (Evolver)
Cc: 'bind-users@lists.isc.or
I'm adding a new domain to my existing authoritative name servers, and need to
add an MX record for a device residing on existing domain. When I run
named-checkzone, I get a message about the MX record being out of zone and not
having an A record. However, at the end of my named-checkzone ou
I'm adding a new domain to my existing authoritative name servers, and need to
add an MX record for a device on the existing domain. That device will serve
both domains until we get a new box in and then we will have separate MX
records/devices for each domain. I have created a new zone file a
I'm running 9.6.1-P3 on RHEL4. Advertising example.com and now have been asked
to advertise a new domain newexample.com (not a subdomain). What is the best
way to go about this?
Thanks,
k
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https:/
15 matches
Mail list logo
