nodes depending upon the query type. A search should always end
> on the same node independent of query type.
>
> What is broken is putting a bare SRV prefix into res_search.
> res_search was not designed for that type of searching and doing
> so introduces the sort of security errors ta
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 12:34 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> In message <1401424053.51486.yahoomail...@web121604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>,
> Jiann-
> Ming Su writes:
>>
>>
>> Looking through the traces of the NXDomain vs NoError responses. The
>
ores or changes the actual query with a
"." lookup. Hence the NoError response with the full list of root servers.
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:53 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews
> w
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:53 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews
> wrote:
>> >
>> In message <53879683.2080...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>>> Why the
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> In message <53879683.2080...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>> Why the different RCODES? See RFC 2308. Short version: the
> "NODATA"
>> response occurs when the QNAME exists, but no records match QTYPE. It
>> will also
What could cause BIND to respond with reply code 0x8083 (no such name) vs
0x8080 (no error)?
I have an app doing srv queries without the domain name appended. One time,
server will respond with no such name (flags 0x8083) which causes the app to
query again with domain name appended. Another
In a simple fowarding only name server config:
options {
forward first;
forwarders {
10.220.0.34;
10.220.0.38;
};
}
How does the named process determine when to use one forwarder or both
forwarders? I'm sniffing the traffic and on some queries, it goes for the
fi
> From: Phil Mayers
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 2:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Delayed Zone Transfers?
>
> On 08/06/2012 05:33 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've wondered about views. We went to views to work around
> From: Jiann-Ming Su
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 12:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Delayed Zone Transfers?
>
>> From: Phil Mayers
>> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2
> From: Phil Mayers
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 12:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Delayed Zone Transfers?
>
> On 06/08/12 17:03, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>
>> Here's an example of the zone file being updated, but BIND not serving
> From: Jiann-Ming Su
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 5:38 PM
> Subject: Delayed Zone Transfers?
>
> What would cause a delay in zone transfers? The notify go out immediately
> when
> the serial number c
> From: J
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Delayed Zone Transfers?
>
> Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>> What would cause a delay in zone transfers? The notify go out
>> immediately when the seria
What would cause a delay in zone transfers? The notify go out immediately when
the serial number changes on the master, but some of the secondaries can take
up to 10 minutes before initiating the zone transfer. Also, even after the
zone has been transferred, the secondary will not immediately
I built statically linked binaries, and it fixed the problem.
- Original Message -
> From: Jiann-Ming Su
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 3:50 AM
> Subject: undefined symbol: isc_commandline_index??
>
> Initiall
Initially sent this message to the dhcp-users list by mistake...
Successfully building 9.8.3-P2 on a CentOS 5.x system with rpmbuild. I
can install the RPMs, but when I try to start the named process, I get
the following:
/usr/sbin/named-checkconf: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/named-checkcon
Running 9.6.1-P1 on CentOS 5 with 8 CPU cores. We're anycasting our DNS
service
address. We observe the UDP Recv-Q get as high as 109540 and 2-4 second
response times. The simplest fix is to simply restart the bind process. When
the response time is slow on the DNS service address, I can do
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> > So, to clarify my question. When I add the other two dhcp servers to the
> > masters{} list and set "multi-master yes" will this allow all three dhcp
>servers
>
> > to update the dyn.mydomain.com zon
How does multi-master configuration work? The scenario I have is three ISC
DHCP
servers configured for dynamic DNS, which also act as primary for the dynamic
zone (dyn.mydomain.com):
zone "dyn.mydomain.com" {
type master;
file "ddb.dyn.mydomain.com";
allow
I'm running BIND 9.6.1_P1. The server has multiple virtual interfaces that
BIND
listens on:
listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 172.30.0.213; 192.168.43.98; };
Sometimes I can get quite a huge difference in response time depending on which
virtual interface I query against. For example, most of our users
19 matches
Mail list logo
