LAB'd this and am
always happy to be wrong as it means I have learnt something new! :)
From: Chris Buxton [cli...@buxtonfamily.us]
Sent: 28 February 2014 17:57
To: Jason Brown
Cc: Ivo; BIND Users
Subject: Re: Bind vs flood
On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:12 AM, Jason
10:10
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bind vs flood
RPZ cannot rewrite servfail, it is designed to replace a valid response.
On 2/28/14 11:42 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
Isn't this where RPZ comes in? Using RPZ means it is quicker and easier to null
amplification, also easier to remove
Isn't this where RPZ comes in? Using RPZ means it is quicker and easier to null
amplification, also easier to remove if you do all this with nsupdate, you can
also create a webpage for TS to query any fault against.
From: bind-users-bounces+jason.brown=kcom@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-
3 matches
Mail list logo
