bind-9.6-ESV-R5-P1 crash!!!

2011-12-09 Thread Issam Harrathi
n't exceed 15M and all is OK. And also when i limit the data logged (by modifying the logging statement) all is OK too. so why when the /var/log/messages is about 250 M the bind crash knowing that just before logrotate begin working I have more than 50 % of RAM, CPU, and partition Free. Thank

Re: RPZ configuration examples

2011-11-19 Thread Issam Harrathi
Hi, this is an example: http://dns.blog4ever.com/blog/lire-article-491870-2332506-rpz_et_dns__exemple_de_configuration.html 2011/11/19 babu dheen > > >Hi, > > > > We are new to BIND and would like to implement RPZ in BIND. I have a > following queries with respect to RPZ in BIND. > > > > Ple

Re: servfail are not cached!

2011-09-28 Thread Issam Harrathi
Thanks. 2011/9/27 Jan-Piet Mens > On Tue Sep 27 2011 at 17:32:22 CEST, Issam Harrathi wrote: > > > and you say here it's cached for 30 seconds?! > > Evan said: > > > and we've discussed implementing it in BIND9, but haven't had time yet. > >

Re: servfail are not cached!

2011-09-27 Thread Issam Harrathi
As i test it's not cached at all, and you say here it's cached for 30 seconds?! i'm using 9.7.2-P3. 2011/9/27 Evan Hunt > > I discover that servfail are not cached. is it normal? > > Yes, that's normal. > > Temporary negative caching of SERVFAIL responses for a limited period (up > to 30 seconds

servfail are not cached!

2011-09-27 Thread Issam Harrathi
, all this is OK. But this result is not cached means each time i do my dig my server will try to contact the dns server of blabla.com. Thanks; Issam Harrathi. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

strange result with RPZ

2011-09-16 Thread Issam Harrathi
127.0.0.17 *.net IN A 127.0.0.17 ; i list all tld here The problem is that my server answer a.b.c.myzone.fr but also answer all the zone myzone.fr like www.myzone.fr , ftp.myzone.fr, why? Thanks. Issam Harrathi ___ Please v

CVE-2011-1910 vs bind 9.6-ESV-R4-P3

2011-08-03 Thread Issam Harrathi
Hi all, when i see this about the affected version by the CVE-2011-1910: 9.6: 9.6.3, 9.6-ESV-R2, -R3, -R4, -R5b1 does this mean that the 9.6-ESV-R4-P1 is affected? Thanks. Issam Harrathi. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind