Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

2009-07-13 Thread Hokumae
Agreed. I suspect over-exuberance on the part of the network security team with either the router or the PIX config. This is a only-recent problem and I am just going to hand it back to them. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://l

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

2009-07-13 Thread Hokumae
Thanks for the quick response Mark. I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, and no joy (not sure why). I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is a mirrored round-robin server ring behind the router answering first-come-first-serve for several servi

Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

2009-07-13 Thread Hokumae
I host a portable class C subnet (A portable /24): 192.75.X.X I run an instance of BIND 9.4.3_p2 on a NAT'd machine (2.6.29-gentoo-r5): 10.10.10.10 The NAT is handled by a Cisco 1760 BIND is configured in a "Split View" INTERNAL/EXTERNAL configuration. The problem -- PTR requests for the 2 MX ser