Hi bind-users,
Apologies if this is inappropriate for this list. I am trying to debug a
failure to resolve an external name.
It appears that when I try to resolve the name ec.europa.eu over IPv6
using either dig +trace or with a caching named that it sometimes fails:
[nimbus]root: dig -6 ec
Hi!
Is there any option to suppress warnings if using transfer-source /
notify-source specifying ports ?
/etc/bind/named.conf:90: 'notify-source': specifying a port is not
recommended
/etc/bind/named.conf:91: 'notify-source-v6': specifying a port is not
recommended
/etc/bind/named.conf:88
supply more details like the name of the zone so people
can actually try and figure out what the issue is.
Mark
> On 2 Sep 2020, at 01:06, Duncan wrote:
>
> I am using DNSSEC for more than 5 years now (never had a problem so far), but
> after upgrading to the latest bind-9.1
I am using DNSSEC for more than 5 years now (never had a problem so far),
but after upgrading to the latest bind-9.16.4 the verification fails using
Verisign's DNSSEC Validator.
I reverted back to 9.14.12 and everything works as expected.
First I started upgrading my secondary DNS-Server (p
Not unusual in my experience.
Probably find the dns is badly configured - at a guess different ns
records at root servers or missing/badly configured ns records.
Check the dns of the domain out with dnsstuff.com and fix any errors.
Probably find it works then.
Duncan
Alans wrote:
Hi
Ignore this request.
I found the explanation.
https://www.verisign.com/domain-name-services/domain-information-center/dns-
behavior/index.html
It matches my customer issue so I'm glad to be able to confirm to him the
problem and why it has suddenly appeared.
Thanks
Duncan
> -
hange has
so I can explain to irate customers why its their issue and not ours!
Thanks
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+duncan=dcl.co...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+duncan=dcl.co...@lists.isc.org] On
> Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: 01 M
Thanks adam - Agreed its just host and nslookup, dig is fine.
Duncan
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
can see the host command built from source works correctly.
Not sure how Redhat have managed to break it.
Duncan
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Now filed as bug 561299
Whats the easiest way to upgrade/downgrade bind and bind utils on Fedora and
Centos?
Thanks
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: Lightner, Jeff [mailto:jlight...@water.com]
> Sent: 03 February 2010 15:59
> To: Duncan Berriman; bind-users@lists.isc.o
age-
> From: Lightner, Jeff [mailto:jlight...@water.com]
> Sent: 03 February 2010 15:37
> To: Duncan Berriman; bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: RE: Host/nslookup/dig queries wrong server
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> On checking a CentOS5 and a RHEL5 system I found
Problem is I am specifying the server on the command line, it is supposed to
use only that server, not randomly decide because it can't connect to that
server to try any others it feels like.
Even the -s option makes no difference.
It should even been looking at files or dns....
D
# rpm -q -f `which host`
bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Thanks
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr]
> Sent: 03 February 2010 13:12
> To: Duncan Berriman
> Cc: 'Matus UHLAR - fantomas'; bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
d the following on Fedora 10
bind-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10.i386
bind-libs-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10.i386
bind-utils-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10.i386
bind-chroot-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10.i386
Duncan
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+duncan=dcl.co...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces
r.
I had expected both would be running the same version of bind and am
surprised that they are so different.
Any idea how the correct behaviour can be reinstated and why it is
happening.
Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask but it would appear to be a bind
issue.
Thanks
D
15 matches
Mail list logo