RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

Emmanuel said… -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 4. 8. 2022, at 19:15, Emmanuel Fusté wrote: > > Le 04/08/2022 à 17:48, Dmitri Pavlov a écrit >> Th

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

.16.32 / BIND 9.18.6 / BIND 9.19.4) one more time but with BIND 9.16.21 (or any other version in 9.16.x <25 range )? Thank you very much in advance, Kind regards, Dmitri. -Original Message- From: Ondřej Surý Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:30 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-use

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

day, August 2, 2022 6:30 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 Well, then I don’t know the reason for the difference in your case. And I don’t personally see a compelling reason to investigate a 10% increase in artificial scenario

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

0c" Dmitri. -Original Message- From: Anand Buddhdev Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:42 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 Dmitri, Just downloading, building and installing the latest version of jemalloc like this doe

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

eboot -f Dmitri. -Original Message----- From: Dmitri Pavlov Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:14 PM To: Ondřej Surý Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 Hi, Thank you very much for your feedback, Ondrej. Sharing the steps. Very simple: configure -> m

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

rom: Ondřej Surý Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:20 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 I don’t see jemalloc anywhere in your setup scripts. Preferably use the latest upstream jemalloc version available. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý —

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

e to get the expected smaller memory footprint. Or maybe there are obvious flaws in the experiment? Thanking you very much for patience and cooperation, Dmitri. -Original Message- From: Ondřej Surý Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 8:18 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sub

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

les. That is it. We will test with a higher kernel. Kind regards, Dmitri. -Original Message- From: Ondřej Surý Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:46 PM To: Dmitri Pavlov Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 > On 1. 8. 2022, at 17:19, D

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

the experiment is only to measure a memory footprint of “many” records. Regards, Dmitri. From: bind-users On Behalf Of Dmitri Pavlov Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:19 PM To: Victoria Risk Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org; Ond≈ôej Sur√Ω Subject: RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 Thank you

RE: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2

Thank you ISC, New run with the same input #9.18.5 pmap -x ... | tail -n 1 total kB 34892476 29399048 29395316 #9.16.21 pmap -x ... | tail -n 1 total kB 27935060 27341676 27338344 The diff. Is still the same ~ 2 GB. I’m pretty much sure you will get the same results in your lab