Hi Everyone,
Does BIND 9 support LLQ and UL?
LLQ http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-sekar-dns-llq.txt
UL http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-sekar-dns-ul.txt
They were originally in Apple's dnsextd implementation long ago. In my
own test, it seems that UL is working. When a clien
2016 at 12:06 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:34 AM David Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Is this the right place ask general DNS-SD questions? If not, can
>> someone point me to the right list? I can't seem to find one.
>
>
>
Hi Everyone,
Is this the right place ask general DNS-SD questions? If not, can
someone point me to the right list? I can't seem to find one.
Thanks.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bin
decade to plan for how to deliver IPv6 to you.
>
> Mark
>
>
> In message
>
> , David Li writes:
>> Barry and others:
>>
>> Thanks for the help!
>> It's my bad that the slave zone's subnet range was missing from
>> allow-query. I also added the slav
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:25:43 -0500
> From: Barry Margolin
> To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
> Message-ID:
>
> In article ,
> David Li wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>&g
gt;
> From: "John W. Blue"
> Sent: Feb 19, 2016 1:17 PM
> To: David Li
>
> Cc: BIND Users
> Subject: Re: A Zone Transfer Question
>
> Nothing in the logs, eg? Well so much for getting an easy resolution. :D
>
> If you trust your conf files and logs are
not doing so, please include your entire named.conf file -
> it'll make life much easier.
>
> And if you've solved things already - ignore!
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM, David Li wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Here are the files. They are a
; You can get started by checking your log files to see if named is
> complaining about anything it might not like that is preventing the
> transfer.
>
> John
>
> Sent from Nine
>
> From: David Li
> Sent: Feb 19, 2016 10:46 AM
> To: BIND Users
> Subject: A Zone Transf
dnsserver3.rack3.com.
$ORIGIN rack3.com.
dnsserver3 A 10.4.3.101
$TTL 3600 ; 1 hour
node1 A 10.4.3.11
TXT "001395d7d2a164c7efde811584bbc470b9"
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:59 AM, John Miller wrote:
>
This is my first time to try master slave configuration. Here is a
brief description:
I have two Centos 7.1 VMs - each is configured for a zone. VM1 is the
master for zone1 and slave for zone2. VM2 is master for zone2 and
slave for zone1. Both zones uses DNS Dynamic Update from DH
for the cluster?
2. Does it make sense to have one master authoritative DNS server and
two other slaves to cover the cluster and meet the HA requirement?
Thanks.
David
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2016, at 9:33 PM, David Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
&g
Hi,
I am new to BIND. I am researching for a DNS server that can meet a
list of requirements to be used in a distributed system. They are:
1. Security (DNSSEC)
2. High Availability (HA)
3. Service Discovery (DNS-SD)
So I think BIND might be my best choice so far. Others I have looked
at include
12 matches
Mail list logo
