Re: minimum cache times?

Hello, On 07.10.2010 02:40, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <4cad0856.9010...@arcor.de>, Christoph Weber-Fahr writes: >> Well, I was talking about minimum values, and, especially, >> a min-ncache-ttl, i.e. a minimum for negative caching. >> >> My point of view is

Re: minimum cache times?

hich causes other problems, but keeping data past > its expiration time is not the answer. Caching is part of the protocol, too. If there are large scale developments sabotaging that it forces me to have much more resolver capacity online. And that costs *me* money. Yes, publisher sho

Re: minimum cache times?

ine. And that costs *me* money. Yes, publisher should know best - but apparently he often doesn't, and publishing bad DNS data affect's other people's systems, too. Regards Christoph Weber-Fahr ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

minimum cache times?

it into Debian's BIND. Can anybody give any more information on that? Regards, Christoph Weber-Fahr ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Named is causing my server to Kernel panic?

ds, and good luck, Christoph Weber-Fahr ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Doubts about BIND

Or is there another way? You probably know this but: http://www.google.com/search?q=bind-dlz How serious is bind-dlz these days? I mean - that code hasn't been touched for half a decade now. Does it even compile with current bind versions? Regards Christoph

RE: Question about Subdomain Delegation

isted as a zone in its named.conf file. Fix that by including a proper zone defionition for lab into main's named.conf, and I venture to guess your problem will go away. Reagrds Christoph Weber-Fahr ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lis