Re: Operation Cancelled Error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ben, On 7/12/12 10:32 AM, Ben wrote: > Still, my question is open.. I'm not from ISC, but I have an idea what causes this (but I'm not an authoritative source). You can look up the BIND source code. Every caching DNS Server (BIND or other pro

Re: BIND, DNSSEC & AD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello John, On 6/29/12 4:52 PM, John Williams wrote: > The purpose behind this is not to protect the internal AD DNS from > hijacking. But rather to allow internal clients to run DNSSEC > related queries without having to reference external resolver

Re: Understanding cause of DNS format error (FORMERR)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 6/24/12 10:07 AM, Carsten Strotmann (private) wrote: > It might even be a new Windows 2012 DNS server, and it might be an > issue with this new version. This is just speculation, but if it is > an issue with Windows 2012 DNS, it

Re: Understanding cause of DNS format error (FORMERR)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jeffry, On 6/22/12 1:25 PM, Spain, Dr. Jeffry A. wrote: > From what I observed I would conclude that dns11.one.microsoft.com > is a Windows DNS server since it behaves like mine except for the > AA flag not being set in theirs. It might even be

Re: Understanding cause of DNS format error (FORMERR)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gabriele, On 6/24/12 5:57 AM, Gabriele Paggi wrote: > Hello Carsten, > > Thanks for your reply! >> about the FORMERR. This might be caused by a Firewall or other >> middlebox that truncates the large answer containing the NS >> record set for

Re: Understanding cause of DNS format error (FORMERR)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gabriele, On 6/22/12 11:22 AM, Gabriele Paggi wrote: > I'm a BIND novice and I'm trying to understand what causes my > BIND9 resolver (bind97-9.7.0-10.P2) to return an error when queried > for the A record of vlasext.partners.extranet.microsoft

Re: Understanding cause of DNS format error (FORMERR)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gabriele, On 6/22/12 11:22 AM, Gabriele Paggi wrote: > I'm a BIND novice and I'm trying to understand what causes my > BIND9 resolver (bind97-9.7.0-10.P2) to return an error when queried > for the A record of vlasext.partners.extranet.microsoft.

Re: MS AD 2008R2 and bind

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Christian, On 1/3/12 11:00 AM, Melbinger Christian wrote: > > So this is presumably not a problem of the bind servers themselves, > but still, does anyone have an idea how to get rid of the error > messages? > > Anyone know the checkbox to uns

Re: rndc addzone|delzone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/1/12 1:18 PM, DNSbed.com wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 13:05:41 +0100, Jan-Piet Mens > wrote: >>> Has anyone tried the new features of rndc addzone|delzone with >>> BIND-9.7? Will the zone added|deleted get transfered between >>> master and slaves

Take your DNSSEC with a grain of salt ...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, because it was a recurring question in the ISC/Men & Mice DNSSEC trainings this year, I've taken some time to write down my knowledge on NSEC3 use of the "salt" and "iteration" parameters:

Re: rndc reload has no effect?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/31/11 8:09 AM, Ken Peng wrote: > Today I setup a new name system, BIND 9.7.3 with multi-views, zone > transfer are going based on different TSIG-Keys. I have found a > strange problem that when I edited the zone file, anded a record, > increased