You may take a look at google's setting as samples.
It's just grouping, I.e, gmail's SPF:
$ idig gmail.com txt
gmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1
redirect=_spf.google.com"
$ idig _spf.google.com txt
_spf.google.com.300 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:_netblocks.
2011/12/10 :
>> My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
>> When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
>> is almost dead.
>> For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host
>> sometime.
>
> Are these your authoritative or your recursiv
Hi,
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime.
Any idea? Thanks.
Regards.
_
2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff :
> Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME?
>
Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC.
quote:
Never one to let a RFC stand in the way of a solution to a real
problem, we're happy to announce that CloudFlare allows you to set
Hi,
I know maybe this is not related to DNS question, so please excuse me
if it's not that suitable.
I have two server IPs, the A records for them are:
mail.dnsbed.com.300 IN A 74.117.233.4
mail.dnsbed.com.300 IN A 74.117.232.204
The corresponding P
sure with tsig keys.
在 2011-10-11 下午9:23，"Joseph L. Casale" 写道：
> I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to
> master and
>
> slave between two views. I don’t have the luxury of an additional IP, is
> this still possible
>
> with a single ip address?
>
> *
Have you read the BIND logging clause:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/logging.html
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Job wrote:
> Hello Bind-Users ML,
>
> is there a way, a patch or something else, in order to log:
>
> - date/time
> - client
> - request (es www.site.com)
> - reply (es. 1.1.1
this is the stuff what should be done by webserver rather than by DNS. i,e,
Apache rewrite will do that.
在 2011-9-28 下午10:29，"feralert" 写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sure this has been asked trillions of times but since I couldn't
> find any concrete answer/reference in google I am asking you guys in
> thi
i just want to make sure about it, and will the client resolver use the
additional records directly?
在 2011-9-2 下午12:06，"Doug Barton" 写道：
> On 09/01/2011 20:45, 风河 wrote:
>> But why this named does returned additional section?
>
> Rather than focusing on the additional
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Named doesn't return records tagged as additional in the additional
> section. This stops the propogation of bogus records. Note there
> is no requirement for additional records to be added ever. Glue
> records are not additional records e
2011/9/1 Daniel McDonald :
> On 8/31/11 10:13 PM, "风河" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found that some queries have got the response which has additional
>> section, but some haven't.
>> For example, this query with www.google.com got the
Hello,
I found that some queries have got the response which has additional
section, but some haven't.
For example, this query with www.google.com got the answer with
additional section set:
$ dig www.google.com
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P2 <<>> www.google.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->
webmin is anothet option from my experirnce.
在 2011-8-31 上午2:42，"mfla" 写道：
> Dears,
>
> I use ProBIND to administrate my BIND servers.
> I would like to know which other possibities be available for DNS central
management ?
>
> Regards
___
Please visit ht
I have been running it with thousands of views without problem.
在 2011-8-24 下午12:12，"sky shade" 写道：
> Hello
>
> I like to know if bind 9.8 have a limit of view?
> There is any number or I can create something like 1 million views without
> problems?
> There is any performance implication in use to
14 matches
Mail list logo
