On Saturday, May 24, 2025 3:53:57 AM CEST Fred Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2025, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> > I don't think there is anything that I would describe that way. But there
> > may be some rate limiting option(s) that you could use to at least cripple
> > using DNS queries
On 5/23/25 8:53 PM, Fred Morris wrote:
If you fail in an outright, reproducible, measurable fashion you give
your opponent predictability and confidence. As a defender you want to
undermine that and look like an under-resourced, poorly administered
network that somehow, we don't know exactly ho
On Fri, 23 May 2025, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 5/22/25 9:23 AM, Karol Nowicki via bind-users wrote:
Does ISC Bind software by native has any dns tunneling prevention embedded
?
I don't think there is anything that I would describe that way. But there
may be some rate limiting
On 5/22/25 9:23 AM, Karol Nowicki via bind-users wrote:
Does ISC Bind software by native has any dns tunneling prevention
embedded ?
I don't think there is anything that I would describe that way. But
there may be some rate limiting option(s) that you could use to at least
cripple using DNS
I tried it again to get the logs,
*21-May-2025 20:57*:12.064 general: zone sub.example.com/IN/internal:
(primary) removed
*21-May-2025 20:57*:12.064 general: reloading configuration succeeded
*21-May-2025 20:57*:12.064 general: scheduled loading new zones
*21-May-2025 20:57*:12.511 zoneload: zo
5 matches
Mail list logo
