Re: isc-bind service shutdown after update at 9.20.7-1.2.el8

2025-03-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
This looks like named is not sending the systemd notifications to the supervisor. Is there anything unusual on your system? Are those stock ISC packages? Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside

Re: Bind internal name space geo-proximity

2025-03-21 Thread Greg Choules
Hi Karol. The DNS model is that if a zone contains multiple records of the same type with the same owner name - e.g. google.com/NS - then all answers are returned in a response to a query: this is known as an RRSET. In the case of NS records, all RRSETs from anywhere must

Bind internal name space geo-proximity

2025-03-21 Thread Karol Nowicki via bind-users
Hello Everyone  Do we have any option to define order of domain delegation depends from query location ?  For example google.com. NS  dns1.company.com.google.com. NS  dns2.company.com. All in one zone file.  Now when client’s query comes from north america then delegates only to dns1,  when query

isc-bind service shutdown after update at 9.20.7-1.2.el8

2025-03-21 Thread Langlois Joël via bind-users
Hi everyone, After updating my isc-bind packages from 9.20.6-1.2 to 9.20.7-1.2, i try to start the service but it always « shutdown » by himself. My server is a Rocky Linux 8.10 and with the old version (9.20.6) everything is working fine since many mounths. Here is a the part of the out

Re: Custom DNS Filtering Plugin in BIND 9

2025-03-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
It might, except it has been removed (now I admit I don’t remember in which version), because it was proprietary and never had any real users. It should work while it is still available, but I am not really keen on resurrecting the API for yet another proprietary thing. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý —

Re: Custom DNS Filtering Plugin in BIND 9

2025-03-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Greg, not really, but unless the querying is blazingly fast, it needs to use asynchronous processing, and we don't have that now. It is not impossible to write something like this, but with no async-await mechanism in C, it might get complicated very soon. So, I would cross that bridge only i