Hi Ondřej,
On 31 Jan 2025, at 8:16, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> We would appreciate if you can give the following git snapshots a test run
> if you have a capacity to do so.
I can report that 9.18.34-dev compiles and works fine on OpenBSD 7.6, and
9.20.6-dev compiles and works on NetBSD 10.1.
My syst
Hey all,
this is pre-announcement that the BIND 9.21 build system will be drop the
autoconf/automake build system.
We consider the Python to be ubiquitous nowadays and therefore the Meson build
system was picked for its maintainability, speed and ease of use. Additionally,
Meson is available i
Hi,
the BIND 9 team merged an improvement to BIND 9.18.34-dev and 9.20.6-dev
releases that should help with the memory usage in the resolver scenarios and in
the case of BIND 9.18.34-dev there's even improved performance for the
cold cache. The improvements for 9.18.34-dev is significant, for 9.20
Hi,
the BIND 9 team merged an improvement to BIND 9.18.34-dev and 9.20.6-dev
releases that should help with the memory usage in the resolver scenarios and in
the case of BIND 9.18.34-dev there's even improved performance for the
cold cache. The improvements for 9.18.34-dev is significant, for 9.20
On 1/30/25 3:25 PM, Fred Morris wrote:
I don't think everything on the planet needs to support encryption
out of the box if composable components are available.
I'm inclined to agree with you.
However, the only rebuttal that I've heard which I give any serious
credence to is the ability for t
As a belated note, the BIND distribution used to include instructions
(in /dnspriv) for putting nginx in front of the nameserver to implement
DoT. Anecdotally, many people I talked to seemed to have no
understanding or awareness just how simple this implementation is /
was.[0] We need better implem
6 matches
Mail list logo
