I can definitely remember having a performance difference between my container
and a vm. I never bothered to research it any further and thought maybe it was
related to older cgroups implementation, oc, or older distro.
>
> By any chance have you measured the performance difference between GNU
By any chance have you measured the performance difference between GNU
libc and MUSL?
Best Regards,
Taavi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this softw
> On 2. 9. 2024, at 15:22, Devpt Calmarsoft wrote:
>
> strip binaries or not
Oh god, don’t ever do that if you ever want my help with debugging.
Stripping the symbols is a horrible practice that should be not be done. It’s
ok to have a detached symbols that can be installed later, but if you
Le 02/09/2024 à 15:00, Marc a écrit :
I think this will copy duplicates, duplicates increase still layer
size so you have 2x size of a default /usr
Alpine is so small that I did not notice that ! thanks !
so you can only copy individual files
You are right, extra files appear in the diff! I wa
>
> I think this will copy duplicates, duplicates increase still layer
> size so you have 2x size of a default /usr
>
> so you can only copy individual files
>
> You are right, extra files appear in the diff! I was thinking that the
> files already present would be discarded. Copying
Le 02/09/2024 à 13:52, Marc a écrit :
1.
Afaik you don't need to remove packages from builder, the whole builder layer
will be gone.
I did that to avoid copy extra files with the COPY --from=builder command
2.
COPY --from=builder /usr/ /usr/
I think this will copy duplicates, duplicates incr
1.
Afaik you don't need to remove packages from builder, the whole builder layer
will be gone.
2.
COPY --from=builder /usr/ /usr/
I think this will copy duplicates, duplicates increase still layer size so you
have 2x size of a default /usr
so you can only copy individual files
"As long as the
I forgot to specify the runtime dependency packages (fixed Dockerfile
attached), I am sorry.
This is still minimal changes, and the result is now 101MB, which is
still an interesting improvement (371MB before changes). Note that when
building, the intermediate image is visible.
Le 02/09/2024 à
Le 27/08/2024 à 19:52, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
What’s the size difference for you?
I mean if someone wants to play with our Dockerfile and there’s a
significant reduction is size, I would be convinced. But in a world,
where a mobile application that does absolutely nothing has 4 GB, I
feel like
9 matches
Mail list logo
