Re: Broken DNS QNAME Recovery

2024-04-22 Thread Mark Andrews
No. “Forward zones” are not DNS zones. They are overrides to the DNS resolution processes that just happened to be configured in named by overloading the zone syntax element. Similarly stub and static stub are not zones. The are other things. -- Mark Andrews > On 23 Apr 2024, at 01:24, John

Re: Broken DNS QNAME Recovery

2024-04-22 Thread John Thurston
On 4/21/2024 10:05 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: On 19 Apr 2024, at 16:12, Crist Clark wrote: First, yes, I know. Their DNS is broken. They should fix their DNS. We shouldn't need to make QNAME-minimization work around broken DNS. Name and shame a domain name in question, e1083.d.akamaiedge.a

Re: RFC8482: Implementation

2024-04-22 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi. In BIND, since 9.11, there is an option/view statement called "minimal-any", which defaults to "no". That might be what you're after. Cheers, Greg On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 17:29, Amaury Van Pevenaeyge < avanpevenae...@outlook.fr> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been looking for days and days