dns_diff_apply / "del not exact" logging

2024-02-13 Thread Andreas S. Kerber via bind-users
Hi, since upgrading our secondary to 9.18.24 yesterday, I'm seeing the logging messages below. 14-Feb-2024 07:52:24.850 general: error: dns_diff_apply: wur1-ps003.ad01.geXXX/A/IN: del not exact 14-Feb-2024 07:53:28.732 general: error: dns_diff_apply: 1.0.e.4.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/SOA/IN: del not

Re: Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Mark Andrews
Additionally this behaviour is specified in RFC1034 so every nameserver should do this. -- Mark Andrews > On 14 Feb 2024, at 02:24, Friesen, Don CITZ:EX via bind-users > wrote: > > Andy, > The existence of 8.f.0.f.1.f.1.0.8.a.b.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa as an > authoritative zone on the server

RHEL, Centos, Rocky, Fedora rpm 9.18.24

2024-02-13 Thread Carl Byington via bind-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source rpm, and build instructions. This .src.rpm contains a .tar.gz file with the ARM documentation, so the rpm rebuild process does not need sphinx- build and associated dependencies.

RE: Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Friesen, Don CITZ:EX via bind-users
Andy, The existence of 8.f.0.f.1.f.1.0.8.a.b.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa as an authoritative zone on the server has higher relevance than the delegation inside another zone. The answer comes from the authoritative zone, no need to follow the delegation. Don Friesen -Original Message- From:

Re: Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Don, Yes. If you want actual names to look at, these zones are both present on the same servers: 1.f.1.0.8.a.b.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa 8.f.0.f.1.f.1.0.8.a.b.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa However, the presence of 8.f.0.f.1.f.1.0.8.a.b.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa is a mistake and in the mean time someone has c

Re: Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Ondřej Surý
Yes, that's normal and expected. The server would not know if the zone is delegated to it or not, so it responds to queries for zones that are hosted (configured) on that server. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do no

RE: Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Friesen, Don CITZ:EX via bind-users
Andy, You do also have the A record glue for elsewhere.example.com in the example.com zone, right? Just checking. Don Friesen -Original Message- From: bind-users On Behalf Of Andy Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 6:23 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Answers from subzone

Answers from subzone even when superzone has a delegation elsewhere

2024-02-13 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, I'm running: 9.16.44-Debian (Extended Support Version) If I have zones example.com and sub.example.com both loaded, but example.com contains a record: sub.example.com. NS elsewhere.example.com. (i.e. the subzone is delegated to some other server) is it normal and expected that a query fo