Hi Prashasti.
I'm on my phone, so I'll keep it brief.
- ditch both 9.8 and 9.11; install 9.18
- why are you forwarding to yourself? 127.0.0.1
- get binary packet captures and look at them in Wireshark to see what's
actually going on.
- real IPs please.
- why use "port xxx"?
Cheers, Greg
On Tue, 1
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:28 AM Prashasti Arora
wrote:
I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application
on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I
have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8
and the other use
Thanks for the help. I guess it is time to move to 9.18.
_
Nicholas Miller, OIT, University of Colorado at Boulder
> On Sep 19, 2023, at 1:53 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> [External Email - Use caution]
>
>
>> On 19. 9. 2023, at 9:25, Petr Špač
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:28 AM Prashasti Arora
wrote:
> I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application
> on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I
> have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8
> and the oth
On 19. 09. 23 9:53, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On 19. 9. 2023, at 9:25, Petr Špaček wrote:
$ bin/dig/dig +short -p 12345 pms.psc.gov @127.0.0.1
$ bin/dig/dig +noall +comments -p 12345 pms.psc.gov @127.0.0.1
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 45084
;; flags: qr rd ra; Q
I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application
on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I
have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8
and the other uses bind9.11. Configuration is also identical for both.
On t
> On 19. 9. 2023, at 9:25, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> All can I tell you is "it works on my system" (with BIND, of course):
I can reproduce this on BIND 9.16 (-c /dev/null as named.conf):
## BIND 9.19-dev
19-Sep-2023 09:33:51.633 validating pms.psc.gov/CNAME: no valid signature found
19-Sep-2023 0
On 18. 09. 23 15:29, Nicholas Miller wrote:
I know this is an old thread but we are having issues resolving pms.psc.gov as
well. Disabling DNSSec validation on a test server doesn’t solve the problem. I
can add a forwarding zone for ha.psc.gov pointed to their NS servers and things
work. I wou
On 18. 09. 23 18:02, John Thurston wrote:
Yep.
I understand the IP space can be delegated, and some of it allocated for
use by systems registering in MS DNS. But this isn't going to happen.
There are multiple MS Active Directories, with registered machines
scattered willy-nilly across the 10-
9 matches
Mail list logo
