Re: resolver: DNS format errors

Correction, they incorrectly answer the SOA query. > On 19 Sep 2023, at 09:53, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > >> On 19 Sep 2023, at 02:14, Alex wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:06 PM Mark Andrews wrote: >> Spamhaus’s servers are sending back responses that do not answer the >> ques

Re: resolver: DNS format errors

> On 19 Sep 2023, at 02:14, Alex wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:06 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > Spamhaus’s servers are sending back responses that do not answer the > question. Named is doing QNAME minimisation using NS queries and rather than > the servers sending back a NODATA respo

Re: resolver: DNS format errors

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:06 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > Spamhaus’s servers are sending back responses that do not answer the > question. Named is doing QNAME minimisation using NS queries and rather > than the servers sending back a NODATA response for the empty non-terminal > names they are sending

Re: consolidating in-addr.arpa data

Yep. I understand the IP space can be delegated, and some of it allocated for use by systems registering in MS DNS. But this isn't going to happen. There are multiple MS Active Directories, with registered machines scattered willy-nilly across the 10-dot address-space, sometimes several compe

Re: unresolvable pms.psc.gov, but google/cloudflare/unbound work

I know this is an old thread but we are having issues resolving pms.psc.gov as well. Disabling DNSSec validation on a test server doesn’t solve the problem. I can add a forwarding zone for ha.psc.gov pointed to their NS servers and things work. I would love to know what is broken here. > dig p