Re: bind with qname min. fails to continue recursing on one specific query

2023-03-27 Thread jmurray
* Mark Andrews [230327 19:17]: > The servers don’t respond to queries for names that don’t exist. The > servers (or the firewall in front of them) are misconfigured. All it > does it make it harder to determine if a server is working or not. > > Mark This completely explains my experience. I h

Re: bind with qname min. fails to continue recursing on one specific query

2023-03-27 Thread jmurray
* Greg Choules [230327 17:59]: > Hi Jason. > I just tried this on my server (9.18.11) and it does indeed appear to be qname > minimisation. The following servers (NS for [1]tn.gov) just don't respond to > the query "_.[2]edison.tn.gov": > > [3]dns4.tn.gov: type A, class IN, addr 170.141.167.222 >

Re: bind with qname min. fails to continue recursing on one specific query

2023-03-27 Thread Mark Andrews
The servers don’t respond to queries for names that don’t exist. The servers (or the firewall in front of them) are misconfigured. All it does it make it harder to determine if a server is working or not. Mark [ant-7149:~/git/bind9] marka% dig dns4.tn.gov @170.141.167.222 ; <<>> DiG 9.19.11-de

Re: bind with qname min. fails to continue recursing on one specific query

2023-03-27 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Jason. I just tried this on my server (9.18.11) and it does indeed appear to be qname minimisation. The following servers (NS for tn.gov) just don't respond to the query "_.edison.tn.gov": dns4.tn.gov: type A, class IN, addr 170.141.167.222 dns5.tn.gov: type A, class IN, addr 170.141.168.22 QM

bind with qname min. fails to continue recursing on one specific query

2023-03-27 Thread jmurray
Hi, Recursive queries to a pair of matching bind 9.16 servers on openbsd 7.0 are timing out unexpectedly for only two names: "www.edison.tn.gov" and "www.tn.gov". Both bind instances are otherwise working fine, and have been for some time. The query returns a CNAME, and there's a delegation to

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9.18: (root-)delegation-only option

2023-03-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.03.23 17:36, Ondřej Surý wrote: in line with our deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list about our intent to deprecated the delegation-only and root-delegation-only options. This is again adept for expedited deprecation - it will be removed in BIND 9.20 and deprecated in BIND

AW: Bind not sending notifies for some time

2023-03-27 Thread Klaus Darilion via bind-users
> > On 24. 3. 2023, at 14:36, Klaus Darilion via bind-users us...@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > > > Is there some rate liming in Bind? > > https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html#namedconf- > statement-notify-rate For the records: Increasing the notify rate solved our problems. Thank