Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

2022-10-31 Thread Ondřej Surý
Since we have already established that this is not a **dig** issue, you might want to look at the `minimal-responses` option. The default has changed from `no` to `no-auth-recursive` in 9.12.0 Anyway, the 9.16.0 is doing the right thing because there's a zone cut between the two names, any resolv

Re: Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue

2022-10-31 Thread Mark Andrews
Cross zone CNAMEs cause accidental cache poisoning with some clients when both zones are on the same server. Named no longer follows the CNAME for non-recursive requests to prevent this. More security aware clients will restart the query after processing the CNAME. -- Mark Andrews > On 31 O

Re: Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue

2022-10-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 31.10.22 15:04, Nagesh Thati wrote: Hello, Hello, gmail sucks very much when it comes to formatting plaintext portions of e-mail. That makes mail hard to read. I recommend you using different mail client, mozilla trhunderbird should be fine. I am facing an issue with CNAME and PTR recor

Classless reverse zones CNAME and PTR resolution issue

2022-10-31 Thread Nagesh Thati
Hello, I am facing an issue with CNAME and PTR records resolution issues when classless reverse zones are defined in the BIND 9.16.* version (Without recursion), but it used to work in 9.11.* version (Without recursion). Below example shows what reverse zones are created and how the dig output is g