Re: Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

Hi Prasanna, first of all, I would recommend you to conduct all the testing using the latest 9.16.33 release. There is a difference in a memory usage between the versions, but you are not the first person to report the increased memory usage during the resolver operation. We've been unable to

Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

Hi team, We had recently upgraded our bind nameservers from 9.14.10 to 9.16.28. This led to the hosts gradually using up a lot of memory and eventually named was OOM killed as it consumed nearly 7GB out of total 8GB server memory. (This package was built from source for centos 7) I’ve been loo

Re: Mailing list questions (DMARC, ARC, more?)

Hi Dan, On Sat 24/Sep/2022 01:10:12 +0200 Dan Mahoney wrote: On Aug 23, 2022, at 07:39, G.W. Haywood via bind-users wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote: I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm clear about the former, I'm curious about how ARC