Re: BIND caching of nxdomain responses

2021-10-22 Thread Dan Hanks
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:57 AM Dan Hanks wrote: > > Greetings, > > As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when > deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use > whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL, and the SOA.minimum value as the > le

Re: BIND caching of nxdomain responses

2021-10-22 Thread Dan Hanks
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:29 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 22.10.21 09:57, Dan Hanks wrote: > >As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when > >deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use > >whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL,

Re: BIND caching of nxdomain responses

2021-10-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.10.21 09:57, Dan Hanks wrote: As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL, and the SOA.minimum value as the length of time to cache the NXDOMAIN. I h

BIND caching of nxdomain responses

2021-10-22 Thread Dan Hanks
Greetings, As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL, and the SOA.minimum value as the length of time to cache the NXDOMAIN. I have a situation where I am