> On 16. 5. 2021, at 22:20, Chuck Aurora wrote:
>
> Yes, I saw that. But the HTML markup is super nice to go to
> hyperlinked settings and related documentation sections. Will
> the HTML documentation no longer be available at all, other
> than to access it online?
1. install sphinx-build (pip
On 2021-05-13 09:41, Software Info wrote:
Wow. Thanks so much for all the responses. Really appreciate it. They
made me truly realize that a lot on the info on the net may be either
incomplete or just old. I understand a bit better now.
I added the line inline-signing yes;
inline-signing is not
On 2021-05-16 14:59, Ondřej Surý wrote:
yes, the generated documentation is no longer part of sources, but you
can read the rst files used to generate documentation - those are just
plain text files with little extra markup.
Yes, I saw that. But the HTML markup is super nice to go to
hyperlink
Chuck,
yes, the generated documentation is no longer part of sources, but you can read
the rst files used to generate documentation - those are just plain text files
with little extra markup.
Also yes, you need ISC GitLab account to create new issues (unless it’s a
security vulnerability then
I was about to reply to some other post on this list, when I
needed to look something up to be sure about it, and I looked in
my local OS (Slackware) documentation directory for the BIND 9
ARM. It's there in what appears to be a format for the Sphinx
documentation builder, but no longer shipped i
Hello again,
On Sun, 16 May 2021, I wrote:
... If you can't agree their numbers then
you're some information ...
Having screen troubles. The word 'missing' is missing.
--
73,
Ged.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-user
Hi there,
On Sun, 16 May 2021, Dan Egli wrote:
... I'm aware of the buddyns.com servers not responding. Noting I can
do about that. They CLAIM I've had over 300k requests in the last couple
of weeks and have exceeded my monthly cap. I say Bull Crap ...
I'd be inclined to believe them, but yo
Even jupiter.eglifamily.name. doesn’t return DNSSEC signed zone:
$ dig +norec +dnssec IN mx newideatest.site @jupiter.eglifamily.name.
; <<>> DiG 9.17.11-1+0~20210318.53+debian10~1.gbp0184f1-Debian <<>> +norec
+dnssec IN mx newideatest.site @jupiter.eglifamily.name.
;; global options: +cmd
;; Go
Yea, I'm aware of the buddyns.com servers not responding. Noting I can
do about that. They CLAIM I've had over 300k requests in the last couple
of weeks and have exceeded my monthly cap. I say Bull Crap and am
looking to move to different servers.
Meanwhile, I found that the google nameservers
Sorry, miss read your version 11 vs 16. That said it is hard to work out what
is going wrong when
you keep changing things and don’t actually have nameservers that are
responding. You had servers
that where giving DNSSEC responses, then ones that are returning unsigned
responses and now ones
I think Mark jumped on something else, your zone is seriously broken and not
because of DNSSEC:
https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/newideatest.site
All of these NSes must have the correct zone content and not be broken:
newideatest.site. 3600IN NS jupiter.eglifamily.na
11 matches
Mail list logo
