Hey there. I looked in the README and I dont see an INSTALL file at all
so I have to assume that the testing docs exist somewhere.
I build 9.11.31 after wrangling the Makefile(s) everywhere and now I
have built a separate machine to run the tests. I needed that because
there are a bucket of in
[ Classification Level: GENERAL BUSINESS ]
I just checked the ARM, and it denotes that "match-recursive-only"
(boolean) still exists for views. So, you might be able to set up a special
view with that, as well as a negated match-clients, specifying allow-query
{ none; }. Put it as the first view,
I have,
allow-query { any; };
allow-query-cache { recursive-users; };
allow-recursion { recursive-users; };
How can I make sure that none recursive-users get a REFUSED if query is
recursive?
Axel
PS: I want to minimize the responses to this amplification attack:
- - -
1
Roee Mayerowicz wrote:
> I have ~700k (and growing) domain names that should be resolved daily.
> I'm trying to make it efficient as possible using the recursive BIND
> server (do you know a better option?), the goal is to get 2000 queries
> per second with minimum server\s cost.
I do bulk looku
On 5/5/21 08:35, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Use a non EoL version of OpenSSL.
>
alpha $ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.1k 25 Mar 2021
Not a problem. I have all that sorted out and I did go climb all over
the Makefile in bin/tools and see that it is borked. So I did some
un-bork and now the compile comp
Use a non EoL version of OpenSSL.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 5 May 2021, at 22:32, Dennis Clarke via bind-users
> wrote:
>
>
> This has kept me spinning in a few hours since yesterday. So I gave a
> try at configure and compile of bind-9.11.31 on ye Fujitsu/Oracle SPARC
> Solaris 10 boxen and I
This has kept me spinning in a few hours since yesterday. So I gave a
try at configure and compile of bind-9.11.31 on ye Fujitsu/Oracle SPARC
Solaris 10 boxen and I see :
.
.
.
/opt/developerstudio12.6/bin/cc -mt
-I/opt/bw/build/bind-9.11.31_sunos5.10_sparcv9.003 -I../..
-I/opt/bw/build/bind-9.
I have ~700k (and growing) domain names that should be resolved daily. I'm
trying to make it efficient as possible using the recursive BIND server (do you
know a better option?), the goal is to get 2000 queries per second with minimum
server\s cost.
I thought using a single packet for multiple q
Hi
I have a caching resolver. Is it possible to log the IP address of the
queried forwarder without too much overhead?
As I see, the resolver category should log this, but only in debug 3. Is
there another way to do this?
Thanks
Levi
___
Please vi
9 matches
Mail list logo