Re: How to compute db.192.168.x names from network addresses ?

2020-10-01 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01.10.20 17:46, Olivier wrote: Here or there, you can read configuration files named like db.192.168.42 when holding data for a 192.168.42.0/24 network. For networks with a /24 mask, simply striping ending 0/24 substring from 192.168.42.0/24 is enough. But what about network with a different

Re: AppArmor, DHCP, Bind9 issue [SOLVED]

2020-10-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 1. 10. 2020, at 17:27, Olivier wrote: > > 1. I'm hesitant to file a bug on Debian about this. As this both involves > Bind9 and AppArmor, would you say it deserves to be implemented and > documented in default Bind9 installation or that it is too specific for this ? Speaking with my Deb

How to compute db.192.168.x names from network addresses ?

2020-10-01 Thread Olivier
Hello, Here or there, you can read configuration files named like db.192.168.42 when holding data for a 192.168.42.0/24 network. For networks with a /24 mask, simply striping ending 0/24 substring from 192.168.42.0/24 is enough. But what about network with a different prefix ? 1. How can you com

Re: AppArmor, DHCP, Bind9 issue [SOLVED]

2020-10-01 Thread Olivier
Hello, Thank you all for replying ! Thanks to your suggestions, creating an /etc/bind/subdir directory, and tweaking /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named allowed me to let ISC DHCP update Bind9 entries. 1. I'm hesitant to file a bug on Debian about this. As this both involves Bind9 and AppArmor, woul

Re: bind 9.16.7 Odd query error (Borja Marcos)

2020-10-01 Thread Bob McDonald
My config took the following combination before it would work: max-recursion-depth 20; max-recursion-queries 275; I'm running both IPv4 and IPv6. Regards, Bob On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:37 AM Borja Marcos wrote: > > > > On 30 Sep 2020, at 22:34, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > No,

Re: bind 9.16.7 Odd query error (Borja Marcos)

2020-10-01 Thread Borja Marcos
> On 1 Oct 2020, at 08:36, Mark Andrews wrote: >> According to the documentation the default values for fetches-per-zone and >> fetches-per-server are zero, >> which means there is no limit. > > Sorry, shouldn’t answer when on a phone. See max-recursion-queries Thanks, yes, I found it while