Re: distribution of Bind software through our website

Hi Shubham, As Michael said, BIND is open source and as long as you comply with the MPL 2.0 license, you can redistribute it freely. We do have a ‘current’ directory at https://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/ , you might want to just mirror that. We would prefer i

Re: distribution of Bind software through our website

The BIND software is released under the Mozilla Public License 2.0. You can refer to the LICENSE file to learn about your rights in BIND or most other open source projects. The only exception to my knowledge would be projects with no license - those are all rights reserved by default to protect aut

VS: VS: CNAME / TXT

In their (mailgun) instructions to the client. And then the client wanted us to include those to his zone. CNAME of course is useful in general, but like I wrote, *here* it is not needed. Jukka On 23.08.20 09:59, Jukka Pakkanen wrote: >Yes, I think the whole CNAME is useless here anyway. C

Re: VS: CNAME / TXT

On 23.08.20 09:59, Jukka Pakkanen wrote: Yes, I think the whole CNAME is useless here anyway. CNAME is useful, but it does not (and can not) work the way you want. These were the recommendations of this service provider, mailgun though.. where? the CNAME issue is long known and clarifies in