Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-14 Thread Nis Wechselberg
Totally not BIND related, but in BDSM "top" and "bottom" are quite widely used. So there is a non-slavery-related nomenclature there as well. Am 15.06.20 um 00:53 schrieb Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users: > ISC had a statement about it a time > ago: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/942815837299

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-14 Thread Brett Delmage
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: ISC had a statement about it a time ago:  https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/942815837299253248 Thanks. I vaguely recalled something but my search didn't turn this up. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-14 Thread Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users
ISC had a statement about it a time ago: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/942815837299253248 You can now call primary and secondary zones. But the prevalence of terms are still master and slave. And I really hope this thing of changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to political c

BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-14 Thread Brett Delmage
I just read GitHub, Android, Python, Go: More Software Adopts Race-Neutral Terminology at https://developers.slashdot.org/story/20/06/14/173/github-android-python-go-more-software-adopts-race-neutral-terminology The BIND 9.11 Administrator Reference Manual at https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-014