Re: Allow only temporary zone updates without making them permanent

2019-06-30 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 6/30/19 11:34 AM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote: I'm quite confident that Dynamic* zones are /NOT/ /required/ to support automation of ACME client operation using DNS for authentication / authorization. That being said, I do think that Dynamic* zones are probably one of the /easier/ wa

Re: Allow only temporary zone updates without making them permanent

2019-06-30 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 6/30/19 3:38 AM, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users wrote: If you do it manually yes; if you do it automatically from a cron job, everything is timed. How does using a cron job change things? Let's Encrypt (or other ACME providers) behaves the same way for manual client operation as they d

Re: Allow only temporary zone updates without making them permanent

2019-06-30 Thread Carl Byington via bind-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2019-06-30 at 12:38 +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users wrote: > Again, no it is not required but only if you do it manually. The idea > here is to automate everything and, unless I am missing something, > there is no other way to do th

Re: Allow only temporary zone updates without making them permanent

2019-06-30 Thread Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users
On 30/6/2019 0:29, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote: > On 6/29/19 2:13 PM, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users wrote: >> Standard DNS mechanisms and poll would not work. Everything must be >> done within 1 minute so notify MUST be used and therefor zone serial >> must be increased and of course all