Re: dig +trace question

2019-06-21 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Anand Buddhdev wrote: >On 21/06/2019 22:01, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> I'll switch to using the 9.14.3 or 9.15.0 dig command as soon as possible. >> Until then I have a nice temprary workaround, which is to just append >> @a.root-servers.net to my dig +trace commands. > >Just one

Re: dig +trace question

2019-06-21 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 21/06/2019 22:01, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Hi Ronald, > I'll switch to using the 9.14.3 or 9.15.0 dig command as soon as possible. > Until then I have a nice temprary workaround, which is to just append > @a.root-servers.net to my dig +trace commands. Just one note. 9.15.0 has the same prob

Re: dig +trace question

2019-06-21 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Anand Buddhdev wrote: >On 21/06/2019 04:55, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> What is it about unbound/local-unbound that makes it not plug and play well >> with dig +trace? What is it that Google's public name servers are doing >> that a local running instance of unbound and/or loca

Re: Static-stub server-addresses re-order

2019-06-21 Thread Ben Lavender
Don't suppose anyone knows this do they? Thanks On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, 16:21 Ben Lavender, wrote: > Hello, > > Quick question, if we have a number of these IPs that do not reply > (timeout), would BIND re-order these like it would with forwarder IPs? Or > would it fail if it used one that didn't

ISC is hiring!

2019-06-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hey, TL;DR https://jobs.isc.org/ ISC is looking for a talented people to join the BIND 9 team to work on the open source and help improve the Internet. We have two openings - Software Engineer BIND 9 and QA Engineer for BIND 9. You can check the requirements and apply for the job at https://jo

ISC GitLab User maintenance (removing user account cruft)

2019-06-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, ISC plans to do a maintenance on the GitLab accounts. There are a lot of accounts that are either unused or just spammy. The spam accounts are just spam SEO accounts (BetPokerOnline, WriteYourThesis, …) and the delete action on the account also means a whois + fail2ban sequence (there’s a

Re: dig +trace question

2019-06-21 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 21/06/2019 04:55, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > What is it about unbound/local-unbound that makes it not plug and play well > with dig +trace? What is it that Google's public name servers are doing > that a local running instance of unbound and/or local-unbound isn't doing? This is a very subt