Hi BIND expert,
I could not have sent the followings thru https://www.isc.org/bind-
subscription-contact/
due to error on the site.
--
I am a S/W engineer who is working on BIND, especially named in Seoul/Korea.
I've got reports from a customer regarding stucked "named" pr
In article ,
"BARAJAS BERMEJO, Sergio" wrote:
> Having said that, in my vps I have defined the following:
>
> ; BIND reverse data file for empty rfc1918 zone
> ;
> ; DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is used for multiple zones.
> ; Instead, copy it, edit named.conf, and use that copy.
> ;
>
> $TTL 86
Meh. Don’t sweat it .. everyone has goofed in some manner at sometime or
another.
Besides, we are team BIND! We won't tell a-n-y-o-n-e.
;)
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of King,
Harold Clyde (Hal)
Sent: Thursday, September 13,
CSTA? Are you talking about the Unify Openscape Voice stuff? If so, then
that's a VoIP platform, the SRV records are used for SIP stuff. So the
service name is "sip" or "sips". You can't just make up service names, out
of thin air, for "dumb" devices that have service names baked into their
code --
OK I made mistakes. I’m sorry for wasting anyone's time, I really am.
I was trying to see if anyone had even made an SRV record for the CSTA service.
My presentation of the dig example was a poor choice.
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edu
Systems Administrator
Office of Information Technology
Shared
On 13 Sep 2018, at 17:03, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
> _csta._tcp.csta.example.com. 3600 IN SRV 20 0 1040
> hostname.example.com
Instead of "hostname.example.com", you need "hostname.example.com.", with a
trailing dot.
Niall O'Reilly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On 13 Sep 2018, at 16:39, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
> Here's what I thought it should be:
> _csta_tcp.csta-example.com. 3600 IN SRV hostname.example.com.
The SRV record needs 4 data items; you've specified only one.
For an easy read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record
For something
Is there an upgrade guide for 9.11?
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:26 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [EXT] bind-users Digest, Vol 3004, Issue 2
[*
You have me dead to rights on that. I was trying to make an example and failed.
Here's my record:
_csta._tcp.csta.example.com. 3600 IN SRV 20 0 1040
hostname.example.com
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edu
Systems Administrator
Office of Information Technology
Shared Systems Services
The
There's a typo in my record. It's _csta._tcp.csta-example.com. 3600 IN SRV
hostname.example.com.
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edu
Systems Administrator
Office of Information Technology
Shared Systems Services
The University of Tennessee
103C5 Kingston Pike Building
2309 Kingston Pk. Knoxville, TN 3
I'm kinda stuck. I am tasked with creating an SRV record for the CSTA service.
But I must be doing it wrong.
Here's what I thought it should be:
_csta_tcp.csta-example.com. 3600 IN SRV hostname.example.com.
Am I even close?
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edu
Systems Administrator
Office of Informa
Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> This reminds me of some interesting (well, interesting to me :-)) related
> research Ben Laurie and I did around that time -- while looking at the
> distribution of generated keys I noticed that OpenSSL / GnuTLS generate a
> different distribution than e.g mbedTLS.
Funky.
Hello again,
Now, I have a new issue, this is my db.zone file (obviously de data info
obviously is false):
$TTL2d
@ IN SOA sergiobarajas. root. (
19 ; Serial
604800 ; Refresh
86400
13 matches
Mail list logo
