On 08/06/2018 08:29 PM, A wrote:
I have a VPS and requested my webhost to fix reverse DNS for my domain &
IP. They responded by telling me to provide them with the records I want.
I found the following response to someone's question on the *Net*:
Many ISPs will put in CNAME records wi
I have a VPS and requested my webhost to fix reverse DNS for my domain &
IP. They responded by telling me to provide them with the records I want.
I found the following response to someone's question on the *Net*:
Many ISPs will put in CNAME records with values that have a
subdom
On Thursday, August 02, 2018 18:13:21 Randy Bush wrote:
> > We run about 300 TLD's on our DNS platform and get roughly 5-10% TCP
> > queries.
>
> that is quite a variance
>
> > In comparison, we get about 25-30% IPv6 queries.
>
> wonder how that compares to others
>
On the secondaries for a For
On 8/6/18, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote:
> Hello
>
> Not sure why I am getting different responses when I perform a dig on
> sso.dol.gov.
>
> Dig is performed from a server which is capable of querying the root
> servers….what could be the issue.
Probably because the bls.gov server gets a dif
They are probably using a load balancer of some sort that is choosing
between multiple systems and directing you to the one closest or no under
load at the moment. The low TTL is usually a sign of this as well.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR <
bhangui.sand...@bls.go
Hello
Not sure why I am getting different responses when I perform a dig on
sso.dol.gov.
Dig is performed from a server which is capable of querying the root
servers….what could be the issue. Both dig commands below are run from the
same server which acts as DNS server capable of performing
sorry for missing letters but my keyboard ia broken
so to say, usually DNS admin low TTL on NS and/or A records that will have a
change
look bind docs to apply it
without specific record TTL , SOA ttl is used
From: bind-users on behalf of King, Harold
Cl
No , you have to NOT REMOVE untile epire of SOA TTL the DNS A record and don't
stop DNS engine
if you don't want loss of name resolution on your domain
Remove NS record from your zone and restart engine so slaves and internet can
be updated
after epire of SOA TTL you can remove A record and
I have ns2.example.com one of my DNS servers. The building, and the reason for
the NS server, is ending. Should I remove the host from our domain name
provider then my actual NS record in DNS, or NS record then provider?
I'd appreciate any help I could get.
--
Hal King
_
As previously posted, I just added a slave of a master for disaster recovery
and now need to know how to promote it should the master be offline too long.
An additional complicating factor is that the master and slave exist on a
failover pair managed by keepalived. My web search has found a fe
If there is already an ISC document I didn't find it, please provide the URL.
I just added a slave of a master for disaster recovery and now need to know how
to promote it should the master be offline too long. What I have found so far
is:
1. For the zone definitions in /etc/named.conf (or e
Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an aside: folk seem to be in the 20% range for ipv6, while overall
> backbone traffic stats are about half that. are dns caches more likely
> to be v6 enabled than the average bear?
I get the impression from various discussions that yes, they are. Actual
citation:
http://w
12 matches
Mail list logo
